Robert Whale can be reached at

Robert Whale can be reached at

The growing disconnect between public servants and the press | Whale

As one small part of the often derided “legacy media,” I am aware that what I am about to say won’t find sympathy with many readers out there.

But it’s been on my mind for such a long time, I figure I may as well say it.

When I began in this business nearly 30 years ago, the beats that guys like me covered — in my particular case, city and county governments and the people who worked for them — were filled top to bottom with public servants much more accessible and willing to speak than they are today.

In those days, it was easy for a reporter — a genre my late father jokingly referred to as “ink-stained wretches” — to arrange in-depth sit downs with public servants, even at the top, who were willing to talk about the issues of the day. They may not have liked doing it — I’m sure most didn’t — but they went ahead.

I think they were willing to do that because, at some deep level, they understood that for all of its faults, and there are many, the free press had a place in the choir, just like they had.

That’s not always the case today. I believe a diminution in the understanding of the press’ role, a role that has been key from the nation’s earliest days and still sets us apart, has taken place, and in step elevated people into positions of power who regard the free press as something alien, a creature antithetical to the American way of life, the enemy.

To get around the press, the tendency today is to create web content more congenial to them, relying on their own in-house spin machines to push out scrubbed versions of events. In this way, public servants are free to weave a rosier picture of the state of affairs than may actually be the case.

I can’t count the number of times in pursuit of a story that I’ve been referred to government-generated web content, which, the person I am dealing with assures me, “explains everything.”

“It’s on our Facebook page, you can read about it there.”

“Yes, but you guys wrote that, and I have a question about — ”

“It’s on the page.”

Now let me bring all this rambling to a point.

In the eight years I covered the current administration in Auburn — I say current because such was not the case with the two previous administrations — not once did its highest elected official consent to an interview beyond the congenial soundbite.

What’s more, Auburn’s highest elected official rarely responds to questions herself anymore— at least from this publication — except to complain about stories she believes were in error. Instead, she has the city’s director of administration handle inquiries for her. In this way, the mayor has insulated herself from all that unpleasantness.

A simple inquiry last spring into how it felt for her to run for re-election without an opponent in the then-upcoming election was rebuffed by the city’s director of administration on the grounds that we were trying to get the mayor to “break the law” by using city-owned resources — a computer or phone at City Hall — to respond when we had specifically noted her concerns about that in our initial request and asked that she respond from a location other than City Hall, say, from home.

In the end we were told we could contact the elected mayor of Auburn via the number she had supplied to the state’s Public Disclosure Commission. We still have the emails from the director of administration — and other e-mails from like rebuffs — to back this up.

But we may all read what the elected mayor of Auburn says online, thank goodness for that.

Look, I don’t want to paint with too broad a brush here. Most public servants are happy to speak. But our colleagues who cover other local cities report encountering similar problems to the one just described up and down governmental organizations, from fire chiefs and police chiefs to city council members and beyond.

Well, buddy, some may respond, and that’s your problem, not mine. Maybe it is. But it may become everyone’s problem should things go awry at any time in the future that people in positions of authority would prefer not to talk about. Except at a distance, except online.

Robert Whale can be reached at

Talk to us

Please share your story tips by emailing

More in Opinion

Cartoon by Frank Shiers
Editorial: Reopen schools in fall, but do it safely

Don’t bully schools into reopening. Protect our students.

Why this newspaper is capitalizing Black | Editorial
Why this newspaper is capitalizing Black | Editorial

Moving forward, Seattle Weekly and the rest of Sound Publishing’s King County… Continue reading

Doreen Davis, left in mask, waves at parade participants on May 2. Olivia Sullivan/staff photo
Wear your face-hugging, ever-loving mask | Editorial

“Don’t make me come down there.” — New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo,… Continue reading

Grocery store staff are working hard to keep the shelves stocked during the COVID-19 pandemic. File photo
Thank you grocery store clerks

Recognizing the sacrifices of our unsung essential workforce.

To our elected officials: Be bold, be consistent, be honest, be helpful
To our elected officials: Be bold, be consistent, be honest, be helpful

By Patrick Grubb, Washington Newspaper Publishers Association Governor Jay Inslee has been… Continue reading

Gov. Jay Inslee talks about homelessness and the climate
Gov. Jay Inslee talks about homelessness and the climate

During an Editorial Board interview, he also discussed a wide range of other issues on the state agenda.

We need to, but how do we talk about race?
We need to, but how do we talk about race?

Racism is still an issue in this country. How can we have constructive conversations to move forward and heal?

Washington State Capitol Building in Olympia. File photo
Despite ruling on Public Records Act, we need to keep a close eye on Olympia

Washington Supreme Court upholds that state legislators are subject to the Public Records Act.

Mind over miles: Thoughts from the Seattle Half Marathon
Mind over miles: Thoughts from the Seattle Half Marathon

Reporter runs the 13.1-mile race in 2:01:40.

Most Read