How Green Is the Governor?

Environmentalists are lukewarm on Jay Inslee’s policies regarding both oil trains and carbon caps.

Last Friday, amid dozens of strident calls for bans on oil trains, Gov. Jay Inslee changed his tune—let’s make them safer—by asking Union Pacific, the railroad company responsible for June 3 derailment in Mosier, Ore., to “halt all oil-train shipments in Washington until they improve inspection protocols” along the railroad tracks.

350 Seattle and other protesters who rallied against oil trains both outside and inside a fundraiser that President Barack Obama held for Inslee on Friday afternoon (to which the President replied, “I’ve still got six months; give me a little more time”) have now launched a petition asking the governor to demand a moratorium on all oil trains in Washington. Calling for a temporary halt to Union Pacific traffic but not BNSF traffic—which is responsible for carrying far more oil in the state—feels insubstantial to some. It’s “not satisfactory,” says activist Patrick Mazza.

Meanwhile, it’s not just oil trains; there’s also been plenty of consternation from environmentalists over the Department of Ecology’s Clean Air Rule, which the Inslee administration rewrote in part to fold in feedback from business and fossil-fuel interests, and which does not meet the goals of the original 2008 Clean Air Act that Governor Inslee used as a basis for ordering the rule in July 2015. It also doesn’t meet the goals recommended by climate science.

“The best science requires eight percent annual reductions starting now,” says Mazza, who wrote a lengthy post on his blog calling out the governor for his lackluster approach to climate policy—and large environmental groups in the state for their lackluster approach to calling out the governor. The current draft rule puts overall statewide reductions at about one percent a year, he says, which “falls so short as to make the rule practically useless to protect the climate and future generations.”

What’s more, despite Inslee’s repeated public congratulations to the eight kid plaintiffs who won their climate-change court case, his administration recently appealed that ruling. In April, Judge Hollis Hill ordered Ecology to complete its final carbon rule by the end of the year; a successful appeal of that decision would release the state from that timeline.

“The public needs to understand that what the governor and the Department of Ecology are doing is greenwashing,” said Our Children’s Trust executive director Julia Olson, one of the kids’ lawyers, in a fierce June 16 statement entitled “Governor Doubles Down on Betraying Youth.”

But the reason for the Inslee administration’s appeal of Judge Hill’s ruling might be merely administrative, says Vlad Gutman, Washington director at Climate Solutions. If the second round of public comments requires dramatic changes—such as far steeper emissions reductions, as Our Children’s Trust is asking—Ecology will have to reissue a third draft, starting the clock on the six-month comment process yet again. Gutman says he has every reason to believe Ecology will keep its promises and release a final Clean Air Rule in August, but appealing Judge Hill’s timeline might in fact allow for a greener rule. “We think [the second draft of the rule] is a meaningful step forward; we think it’s better than the first draft,” he says. And “we agree that it could be better.” But to make it significantly better might put Ecology “in conflict with the court.”

The public “deserves full opportunity to influence the final outcome, and the court-ordered deadline could hamper that,” explains Camille St. Onge, Ecology’s air-quality communications manager. “An appeal preserves our ability to consider comments about the most significant environmental problem of our time from all Washingtonians.”

But as attorney Andrea Rodgers told Seattle Weekly earlier this spring, the Department of Ecology has been calling climate change the most significant environmental problem of our time since 1990. “You know what? Time is running out,” she said then. “26 years is a very long time to get it right.”

It’s unclear whether these dissatisfactions will impact Inslee’s re-election; major environmental groups in the state are standing behind him. But some, like Mazza, who was among the climate protesters outside Inslee’s fundraiser last week, are concerned that “greenwashing” optics take too much of a risk with his base. “They undermine your credibility with a green constituency that you need for re-election,” Mazza writes at the end of the post in an open letter to Inslee, adding that Inslee’s support for methanol refineries in Tacoma and Kalama, a $9 billion highway construction package, and the lack of a hard line with oil trains and oil terminals “did not help much either.”

The next big issue to cross Inslee’s desk: the Tesoro-Savage oil-export-terminal proposal at the Port of Vancouver, now in the last stages of review, which would send up to five more crude-carrying trains along the Columbia River each day. So far, his administration has kept mum on that project (in part because of legal restrictions while the project is under review). But with recommendations against it from the city of Vancouver, the Washington Department of Natural Resources, and the state attorney general’s office, among others, the opposition is fierce: They’ve been flooding Inslee’s office with emails and comments, gathering by the hundreds, and organizing a nationwide Stop Oil Trains Week of Action. All eyes, now, on Inslee; the Energy Site Evaluation Council will finish hearing testimony from both sides in about five weeks, and make a recommendation to the governor after that.

More in News & Comment

The language of the original bill prohibited privately-owned detainment facilities from being contracted by local, state, or federal government entities, but a last-second amendment was adopted to substantially narrow the focus of the legislation. File photo
Lawmakers flinch on banning for-profit detention facilities

Last minute amendment exempted ICE detainment facility.

Cooper Hawkins (9), Nash Hawkins (16) and Charlotte Hawkins (12) at the Hawkins’ home. Courtesy photo
Mercer Island family raises awareness for rare, undiagnosed diseases

Charlotte and Cooper Hawkins were born with an ultra-rare undiagnosed disease.

Replica of Vietnam Memorial making Enumclaw stop

A local vet has spent six years trying to secure this opportunity.

A proposal to make King County Metro fares free for low-income households could be approved in the coming months. File photo
King County considers free transit for low-income residents

The program would target those at or below 80 percent of the federal poverty level.

Federal Way resident Mi’Chance Dunlap-Gittens, 17, died Jan. 27, 2017. Courtesy photo
Law enforcement challenges report on sting operation that killed Federal Way teen

King County Office of Law Enforcement Oversight’s findings rattle Sheriff’s Office, police union.

Unstable housing? Apply for Section 8

Applications open in February for housing vouchers

In 2018, the city of Seattle approved and then repealed a head tax within a month. It would have levied a $275 per employee tax on businesses grossing more than $20 million annually. Sound Publishing file photo
County head tax bill passes committee

Bill would let King County levy a tax on businesses to fund housing and address homelessness.

Gov. Jay Inslee signs the first bill of the 2020 legislative session into law. On the right stands the bill’s primary sponsor, Sen. Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, who is wearing a red tie. Photo by Cameron Sheppard, WNPA News Service
Gov. Inslee signs tax bill to help fund higher education

Law shifts a portion of the tax burden to large tech companies.

King County Metro’s battery-electric bus. Photo courtesy of
King County Metro bus fleet will be electrified by 2035

Future base in South King County would house hundreds of the zero-emission vehicles.

Three-quarters of the suicide deaths among children ages 10 to 14 are caused by firearms, according to a new report from the Firearm Injury and Policy Research Program at the University of Washington. File photo
King County studies youth gun violence amid rising suicides

It’s unclear what’s driving the trend.

A King County work crew clears a road near Preston on Feb. 7, 2020. Heavy rains appear to have caused multiple landslides along the road. Aaron Kunkler/staff photo
The future could look a lot like this year’s flood season

Climate change is expected to lead to more winter flooding in King County.

High tides, as seen in this file photo of Raymond’s Willapa Landing Park in Pacific County, could become the norm in the future due to sea level rise. Sound Publishing file photo
UW summarizes Washington climate impact on water

The report localizes information from the United Nations.