Ferguson speaks at a news conference on February 9 in Seattle about a federal appeals court’s refusal to reinstate the original travel ban. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

AG Ferguson Still Has Concerns Over Revised Travel Ban

There have been significant changes. But the Washington-led legal battle may not be over.

The Trump administration released a revised executive order early Monday that bars travel from six Muslim-majority countries instead of seven, among other changes.

A few hours after the release of the new travel ban, state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, who sued the administration over the original travel ban, said that he and his team scored a clear victory in an ongoing battle: The details of the new order suggest Ferguson’s lawsuit forced the administration to concede on many of the arguments he’d raised.

“The revised executive order speaks volumes about the constitutionality of the original executive order,” Ferguson said during a press conference Monday. “The bottom line is, the President has capitulated on numerous key provisions that we contested in court about a month ago.”

Among them:

*The new order now allows people with visas, green cards, and dual citizenship to enter the United States. The previous order barred all citizens of the seven countries — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen — regardless of immigration status or legal permission to travel.

*The new order allows Syrian refugees to enter the United States after a 120-day moratorium, instead of barring them indefinitely.

*The new order removes language that explicitly preferenced Christian refugees; there is no longer any language declaring a preference based on religion.

*Iraq was removed from the original list of seven countries.

*Another major difference: The new order is set to go into effect on March 16 — unlike the first order, which went into effect immediately, causing chaos and confusion at airports across the globe, including Sea-Tac.

All of this is significant, Ferguson said — “a very significant victory for the people in the state of Washington.” But that is hardly his last word on the matter. Just like the weekend following the release of the original executive order in late January, his team will be working for the next two or three days to determine what its next legal steps are. “The new order, of course, is drastically narrowed,” he said. “We’re reviewing it carefully… (and) anticipate having a determination on any potential next steps on the legal front this week.”

Ferguson declined to specify too much on those next steps. But one major legal concern he did mention was that, as his lawsuit had alleged, the original order violated the Establishment Clause of the Constitution, which protects freedom of religion. “The intent behind the original order was of deep concern for us,” Ferguson said. It was clear to his team that the original order was designed to target predominantly Muslim countries, and that intent doesn’t seem to have changed much this time around. “Yes, there’s a new order,” he said, but the “language related to refugees and now the six countries is largely unchanged.”

That’s certainly the point of view of many local elected officials. “The new Executive Order on immigration announced today may have different words, but the spirit is the same: to exclude people based on their religion and country of origin,” said King County Executive Dow Constantine in a statement. Added Seattle City Councilmember M. Lorena González, also in a statement: “No one is fooled by this Executive Order. It reiterates ill-conceived federal action based in xenophobia rather than fact… I support Attorney General Bob Ferguson and his office in reviewing this new order for its true intent.”

Despite repeated questions from reporters, Ferguson emphasized that the big litigation news will come out later this week. “It’s too soon to say what we’re going to do. That’s the bottom line. The legal issues are complex and numerous.” But certainly, “I do not take lightly suing the President of the United States,” he said. “We need to do our homework and be thoughtful about this.”

More in News & Comment

Protestors gather at SeaTac’s Families Belong Together rally. Photo by Alex Garland
Seattle’s Separated Children

A local non-profit houses several immigrant youths who were separated from their parents at the border. But for how long?

Katrina Johnson, Charleena Lyles’ cousin, speaks at a press conference for De-Escalate Washington’s I-940 on July 6, 2017. Photo by Sara Bernard
Communities of Color Respond to Police Chief Best’s Nomination

Although its a mixed bag for some, the families affected by police shootings say she’s the best one for the job.

While King County Metro has been testing out several trial electric buses since since 2016, the agency aims to have a fully electric bus fleet by 2040. Photo by SounderBruce/Flickr
King County Rolls on With Its Electric Bus Fleet Plans

With an overhaul set by 2040, a new report shows the economic and health benefits of going electric.

Nikkita Oliver speaks at a July 17 No New Youth Jail press conference in front of the construction site of the King County Youth Detention Center. Photo by Josh Kelety
King County Youth Detention Center Moves Forward Despite Opposition

As community criticism of the project mounts, King County tries to take a middle road.

Trouble in Tacoma

A cannabis producer has been shut down for “numerous and substantial violations.”

Between Seattle’s $15 minimum wage and the new no-poach cause agreement, Washington has been leading the nation in advancing fast food workers’ rights. Photo by Fibonacci Blue/Flickr
Washington AG’s Deal Grants Mobility to Fast Food Workers Nationwide

Seven fast food chains have agreed to end no-poaching policies that economists say cause wage stagnation.

The Carlton Complex wildfire burned in north-central Washington state in 2014. Photo by Jason Kriess/Wikimedia Commons
King County Burn Ban Starts This Weekend

Other counties across the state have already enacted similar restrictions.

Numerous complaints against King County Sheriff’s deputies for issues like excessive force and improper search and seizure weren’t investigated due to internal misclassification, a new report says. Photo by Oran Viriyincy/Flickr
Report Finds Complaints Against King County Sheriff’s Deputies Weren’t Investigated

An outside review says that allegations of excessive force and racially-biased policing weren’t pursued.

Most Read