“My plan begins by covering every American. If you are one of

“My plan begins by covering every American. If you are one of the 45 million Americans who don’t have health insurance, you will have it after this plan becomes law.”–Sen. Barack ObamaBy Brian HarperHardly a day goes by without a headline about America’s “health insurance crisis”. Advocates push for reasonable, available health care for everyone. So why does the Washington legislature pass laws which make health care more expensive and less available?Last year, Olympia passed a health insurance mandate requiring “mental health parity”; insurance plans, by law, must now cover mental health treatment at the same levels as they do other health treatment. Such a policy had previously passed in other states, and in all cases the end result is a 5-to-10-percent increase in premiums. Group Health just announced a 10 percent 2008 increase for their individual and family plans. They were the first to announce a hike since Olympia’s 2008 mandate: insurers must now get permission for rate increases from the Washington state insurance office. Should that permission be denied, insurers will have to eat the costs, right? Wrong, ultimately they’ll leave the state, leaving fewer insurance options for consumers.Perhaps our representatives in Olympia aspire toward the New Jersey model. According to America’s Health Insurance Plans, the average cost of a policy in that state for a family of four is $10,398, 80 percent more than the national average of $5,799. A 25-year-old male in Jersey will pay $5,880 a year for an insurance policy, roughly five times the cost of similar coverage in Washington, Colorado, Kentucky or Georgia, as reported by the Commonwealth fund in 2005. The higher costs reflect 42 state mandates, including in-vitro fertilization, chiropractic, podiatry, knee braces and prosthetic limbs, and coverage for unmarried “dependents” until age 30. Is it fair that a twenty-five year old in an entry level job subsidizes the knee brace of a fifty-five year old, or coverage for his unemployed buddy who spends his days playing X-Box in his parents basement?New Jersey also mandates “guaranteed issue”, which requires insurers offer coverage to all applicants regardless of their condition, as well as “community rating”, which prevents insurers from charging higher rates to the sick. This creates a natural disincentive for consumers to purchase insurance when they are well. Freeloaders are also have no motivation to make healthy choices, as their premiums will be the same regardless of their health.Who are the uninsured? The media love a juicy anecdote, and it seems like public policy is often a reaction to a few horror stories of children and the poor. But in reality, 59 percent of the uninsured are young adults (18-44). 24 percent of this age group do without health insurance, presumably by choice. My previous neighbor, for example, was a 41-year-old bartender and raving advocate for nationalized health care who chose to go without insurance. He said he’d rather take that money and take a nice trip every year, and if he has an accident he’ll either incur the debt, or try to slip onto Medicaid after his resources were gone. I snidely mentioned that perhaps he just wants free coverage. This only made him angry.Some argue that the solution, as employed in Massachusetts, is to require that everyone get health insurance. The irony here is that legislatures pass laws which increase the cost of coverage and then blame the people for not being able to afford coverage. And mandates don’t guarantee that everyone will comply. Auto insurance is mandated in all states but three, yet the nationwide uninsured rate for auto is 14.6%, very close to the 15.7% who lack health insurance. Are our legislators aspiring toward the New Jersey model? There isn’t a documented case of a state in which adding mandates didn’t increase the cost of insurance. If you increase the cost of anything, you decrease the resulting demand for it, which simply pushes more people into the uninsured category. Ultimately the question boils down to this: what is the purpose of insurance? Is it to cover every nickel and dime, elective treatment, or to prevent catastrophic loss? As Thomas Jefferson stated, “a government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.”


Talk to us

Please share your story tips by emailing editor@seattleweekly.com.

More in News & Comment

Enumclaw Rehab center a hotbed for coronavirus

Ten clients and two employees have tested positive for COVID-19.

Puget Sound renters will need housing assistance

Nonprofits, activists are expecting greater need as workers are laid off.

State legislators discussed COVID-19 impacts during a East King Chambers Coalition webinar on March 31 moderated by Kate Riley of The Seattle Times. Screenshot
State lawmakers discuss COVID-19 impacts with chambers

Four state lawmakers gathered for a webinar with the East King Chambers Coalition.

Fighting the coronavirus, 100 masks at a time

In the early 1930s, Dorothy Lucille used whatever she had on hand… Continue reading

How will COVID-19 impact wildfire response?

Answers and resources are short in short supply right now, but fire academies are still planned.

Gov. Jay Inslee is pictured March 28 at a field hospital set up at the CenturyLink Field Event Center to address non-COVID-19 medical needs. (Photo courtesy of Jay Inslee’s Twitter feed)
Gov. Inslee warns of stepped-up ‘stay home’ enforcement

“Thousands of calls” from residents concerned about businesses and people not following restrictions.

Property tax deadline extended to June

This only affects those who pay their property taxes themselves.

The 2020 census form will look very similar to this sample document. Image courtesy U.S. Census Bureau
Don’t forget to take the census

Due to the coronavirus, the deadline for responding to the census is Aug. 14, 2020.

Most Read