Guilty, guilty, guilty

Last week, the city of Seattle paid a $5,000 fine for organizing an illegal citizen lobbying effort.

That’s OK; we can afford it. But behind this $5,000 rebuke from the state’s Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) lies a million-dollar question: Why didn’t the city (and King County, in a related case) just admit wrongdoing and pay the dang fine, say, a year ago?

Here’s the legal situation: State law allows cities and counties to directly lobby other levels of government but not to fund so-called “citizen” lobbying efforts. Local governments can inform residents about political issues but must stop short of a “call to action,” a PDC representative told city officials in 1998.

And here are the potential violations: King County sent out 20,000 invitations to a pro-transportation rally in Olympia. Does that constitute a call to action? Of course it does.

In the Seattle case, the Pro Parks Committee was formed by the city to consider new parks-funding measures. The major part of that group’s work was studying, critiquing, and lobbying for a proposed new state tax law. The committee was aided by city staff and met in city buildings. Is this a violation of the statute? Yes, obviously.

But then came the whining. City officials, including the mayor and council president, claimed that the law was vague and the state’s enforcement unfair. A high-priced downtown lawyer was hired and an aggressive attitude adopted, to the point where said lawyer ended up launching personal attacks against the citizen activist who filed the complaint rather than arguing his case (a dumb move, because activist Chris Leman provided the PDC with reams of evidence—all legally obtained from city files).

At least the fact that the case has been settled means the city has gotten a little smarter. With more outside legal support (from a less abrasive attorney), the city fessed up and will now pay up. Still, it’s hard to figure out why city officials, after needlessly delaying this process for more than a year, suddenly decided to accept reality.

Leman has his own theory: It’s an election year, and they “didn’t want a situation where both the mayor and the city attorney were defending a position in which the city would clearly be found guilty.”

At last, an argument that makes some sense.

jbush@seattleweekly.com


Talk to us

Please share your story tips by emailing editor@seattleweekly.com.

More in News & Comment

Enumclaw Rehab center a hotbed for coronavirus

Ten clients and two employees have tested positive for COVID-19.

Puget Sound renters will need housing assistance

Nonprofits, activists are expecting greater need as workers are laid off.

State legislators discussed COVID-19 impacts during a East King Chambers Coalition webinar on March 31 moderated by Kate Riley of The Seattle Times. Screenshot
State lawmakers discuss COVID-19 impacts with chambers

Four state lawmakers gathered for a webinar with the East King Chambers Coalition.

Fighting the coronavirus, 100 masks at a time

In the early 1930s, Dorothy Lucille used whatever she had on hand… Continue reading

How will COVID-19 impact wildfire response?

Answers and resources are short in short supply right now, but fire academies are still planned.

Gov. Jay Inslee is pictured March 28 at a field hospital set up at the CenturyLink Field Event Center to address non-COVID-19 medical needs. (Photo courtesy of Jay Inslee’s Twitter feed)
Gov. Inslee warns of stepped-up ‘stay home’ enforcement

“Thousands of calls” from residents concerned about businesses and people not following restrictions.

Property tax deadline extended to June

This only affects those who pay their property taxes themselves.

The 2020 census form will look very similar to this sample document. Image courtesy U.S. Census Bureau
Don’t forget to take the census

Due to the coronavirus, the deadline for responding to the census is Aug. 14, 2020.

Most Read