Seattle City Light lost another legal challenge to its billing/spending practices when the State Supreme Court ruled today that city taxpayers and not just utility ratepayers must foot costs of reducing greenhouse emissions, reversing a lower court ruling. The decision follows earlier rulings against City Light for spending utility money for non-utility purposes and illegally shifting the cost burden of street lighting from ratepayers to general taxpayers. In today’s ruling, the high court said, “We hold that combating global warming is a general government purpose, albeit a meritorious one, [but] not a proprietary utility purpose. Therefore, such mitigation expenses must be borne by general taxpayers rather than utility ratepayers.” Full ruling here.
More Stories From This Author
Fourth of July weekend weather in King County
Expect mostly sunny and warm weather for the Fourth of July weekend in the Puget Sound region. Below is the…
King County jail audit finds issues in behavioral health services
Addressing the issues could reduce the risk of reoffending.
New King county park rangers to begin patrolling Saturday
Council members hope the increased presence of officials will deter break-ins at trailheads.