Site Logo

Paul: The Hot Fuzz Guys Remake E.T.

Published 7:00 am Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Wiig and Pegg debate how extraterrestrials fit into God's plan.
Wiig and Pegg debate how extraterrestrials fit into God's plan.

This isn’t the third installment in the so-called “Blood and Ice Cream Trilogy” featuring Simon Pegg and Nick Frost. Note the missing element: Edgar Wright, who directed and co-wrote with Pegg both Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz, in which Pegg and Frost re-enacted at least one scene from every buddy-cop movie ever made. Greg Mottola instead directs Paul, and he’s an escapee from Judd Apatow’s stable—along with Seth Rogen, who voices the title character, a shirtless, foul-mouthed, dope-smoking, ass-flashing E.T. It’s the ultimate modern-comedy crossover, as damp a dork’s dream as when Kirk met Picard in Star Trek: Generations, among the approximately 382 films referenced. Wright’s absence is notable; he could have helped Frost and Pegg—playing, respectively, a stalled sci-fi novelist and his illustrator/best friend who chaperone Paul in an RV—stuff Mel Brooks back into their Han Solo Underoos. Worse, the film plods in places, and Wright never wastes a moment. Paul, though, is a simple pleasure—half its dialogue consists of lines lifted from every sci-fi comfort-food staple fed to growing fanboys in the ’70s and ’80s. Kristin Wiig, as a cycloptic Creationist, is the highlight, bringing depth and genuine warmth to the thankless, one-dimensional role of a God-fearing Bible-thumper. An alien concept indeed.