Politicians Cannot Keep Ignoring Vehicle Homelessness

Searching for solutions to help an overlooked unsheltered population in Seattle.

When Count Us In’s 2017 annual homeless count results were published last May, one glaring statistic stood out. Among the unsheltered population counted, 42 percent were living in vehicles.

Despite this finding, people living in vehicles still seem to be a curiosity and little else when it comes to current policymaking. Why? Why doesn’t King County have a systemic plan in place for directly and intentionally addressing the homeless living in vehicles?

All unsheltered homeless are not the same. Those in vehicles differ in immediate-response needs. A blanket “Let’s get you into housing immediately” goal is not the only solution. It ignores the nuances of the situation and the need for interim responses. The hill is steeper than that. The hazards of living on the road are also different than what other unsheltered homeless face. They must deal with the legal aspects of tickets, legal financial obligations, staying street legal (license, tabs, title, tickets), having to move every 24–72 hours, and more.

When responses to homelessness are discussed, local media often turn to two consultant reports issued a few years ago as guidelines for systemic planning. Expensive reports by Barbara Poppe (commissioned by the City of Seattle) and Focus Strategies (commissioned by the All Home Strategic Plan) both have their pluses and minuses, but are not whole blueprints. Poppe turned to “Rapid Rehousing,” a practice that works only if individuals are able to afford market rent once the government-provided rent subsidy ends in less than a year. Focus bemoaned the multiple systems at work—correctly—but its recommendations ended with the All Home Strategic Plan reducing its board, eliminating valued partners from the inner circle. What both reports also failed to include was any approach to unsheltered homelessness and vehicle residency.

The lack of progress on vehicle homelessness is not due to advocates not trying. I’ve seen the efforts firsthand as part of the Interfaith Task Force on Homelessness (ITFH). Action responses have been recommended that could be effective in the short-, mid-, and long-term. Advocates describe the current political process with the phrase “It’s a recipe, not a menu,” because elected leaders who convene task forces on homelessness just selectively pick a few actions from the “menu” and expect change. That doesn’t work. What works is a full, detailed recipe that includes all the ingredients—added strategically—resulting in the desired outcome.

Aiming to bring responses within the All Home Continuum of Care, the ITFH started regional vehicle residency work groups in 2016–17 for South King, East King, and North King. In Seattle, a vehicle-living group was held in the spring of 2017 by Councilman Mike O’Brien. At its conclusion, advocates subsumed that effort into the regional vehicle-residency groups, adding a Seattle-focused group. These regional groups use the All Home name. The issue is that no policy, practice, or funding is attached to the groups’ efforts.

Some in the public sector have asked why no application was made for the substantial Seattle homelessness funding during 2017. It’s because funders think they can offer a lump of money with no desired guidelines (i.e., no recipe) and that—out of the blue—a nonprofit will put together all that’s needed to assist homeless vehicle residents. No organization applied for two reasons: First, most nonprofits simply do not know how to address vehicle residency. Second, the partnerships required involve the public sector, such as police, parking, the courts, and so on. Throwing money at nonprofits to end homeless vehicle residency is foolish. Why leaders in the public sector don’t get it is exactly the problem.

What recipe do All Home advocates (including the ITFH) suggest? Well, it isn’t as closely guarded as the Colonel’s secret recipe. We’ve been repeating the recipe again and again in meeting after meeting with elected officials and public staff. The best places to begin have been outlined: safe places to park on- or off-street, hygiene and trash management, and consent by the vehicles’ residents to start on a pathway to housing. These need to be the guiding priorities. That’s the bottom line.

All Home could be—in fact, must be—what we need. Will they listen? More important, will they act?

More in Opinion

Seattle Jewish Community Also Struggles With Pittsburgh Tragedy

Author’s visit to Seattle offers prescient insight in wake of Pittsburgh synagogue massacre

Washington Lawmakers Could See Hefty Pay Raises

Proposal comes from Washington Citizens’ Commission on Salaries for Elected Officials.

Even With Postage Paid, Voters Couldn’t Send Ballots on Time

While those ballots don’t get counted, taxpayers still must pay the U.S. Postal Service for delivering them.

Republicans Get ‘Whupped’ in Primary Election

The Grand Old Party endured a good old-fashioned butt-whupping on primary night.… Continue reading

Activists rally at the I-1639 ballot drop even on July 6. Photo courtesy Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility
Does Washington Need a ‘Surgeon General’s Warning’ for Guns?

Initiative 1639 would require something similar on paperwork for firearms purchases.

Trump administration tariffs on Canadian newsprint have created additional hardships for newspapers—large and small—and won’t be good in the long run for U.S. paper mills. Photo via Thinkstock.com
Newsprint Tariff Is a Threat to Jobs and Information

The Trump administation’s policy jeopardizes newspapers and mill workers.

Social Justice vs. the NFL

The league’s continued crack down on protests during the national anthem has left some questioning their fandom.

Photo by Matt Phelps
President, Governor or Retirement—Only Inslee Knows His Plan

What we do know is that he’s off to Iowa in June to deliver the keynote address at a party fundraiser.

Aaron Dixon. Photo by Susan Fried
The Black Panthers’ Revolution Never Ends

As the Seattle Black Panther Party marks its 50th anniversary, its disruptive force lives on.

No New Youth Jail protestors block traffic on 5th Avenue on March 12. Photo by DJ Martinez
A New Youth Jail Would Be a Public Health Problem

King County claims a new youth jail would improve public health. Experts in the field strongly disagree.

The King’s Court. Photo by Chase N./Flickr
An Open Letter to the King’s Court

The Mariners boast the best cheering section in baseball, but there’s one major issue…

Attendees wait outside the King County Council Chambers last July. The council ruled that CPCs had to post signs stating that they are not health care facilities. Photo by Sara Bernard
The Crisis of Crisis Pregnancy Centers

CPCs give pregnant women false information, and their advocates are defending this as free speech.