Protesters flooded City Council chambers Monday to protest the police precinct. Photo by Alex Garland

How a Really Expensive Precinct Became a Symbol of Race in Seattle

The racial overtones of the North Precinct debate have frustrated some, but they are clearly here to stay.

Monday afternoon, Council chambers were packed to the gills and hot as an armpit as concerned, ornery citizens voiced their opposition to an expensive proposed new police building in north Seattle. So many people showed up to protest that City Hall security closed access to chambers and directed people downstairs into overflow seating. Anti-building protesters with cardboard signs stood on the sidewalk outside City Hall, waving to cars. Inside, during public testimony, citizens delivered one passionate speech against the project after another.

The main concern: race.

In a clear sign of the strained relationship between police and minorities today, what was once seen as a public infrastructure project in Bitter Lake has grown into a symbol of race in Seattle, a development that seems to ensure that its path to approval will be fraught.

The Council ultimately approved a resolution supporting the project in principle. In doing so, Council members tried to assuage the concerns of Black Lives Matter protesters—who have taken to calling the new building the “bunker” (because it would be earthquake- and bomb-resistant) and flooded Twitter with the #BlockTheBunker hashtag—by agreeing to study how the project will affect racial equity in the city. But no one in City Hall Monday believed that would stem the fierce criticism of the project, which one commenter went as far as to call “an investment in white supremacy.”

How did this happen? How did a rubber-stamp capital project become a reviled “bunker” and the target of a social-justice crusade?

As with any grassroots movement, there’s no one answer to the question. But looming large in the anti-building movement is fear of police violence, a charged and polarizing issue driven by Black Lives Matter activists. For many of them, any investment in police amounts to funding a paramilitary occupation, just as the county’s planned $210 million youth jail represents a capital investment in youth incarceration. Those concerns come in tandem with a nationwide social movement dedicated to radically revising, or perhaps eliminating, the institution of American police, tied to the steady stream of cell-phone videos showing police killing or brutalizing black people.

The racial overtones of the debate have clearly frustrated project supporters. In a sharp exchange with her colleague Mike O’Brien last week, Councilmember Debora Juarez, who supports the project and in whose district the station would be built, invoked her identity and history as a Native American woman as she argued the debate should not be about race. “This is a narrative about public safety,” she told O’Brien. “I will not allow another narrative to conflate here. I will not allow a politicization of anything more than that we’re replacing a police station.

“I don’t know about the rest of the world,” Juarez said, “but I am not afraid of a building. I’m not afraid of the people in the building.”

At another meeting, Juarez said: “I grew up in a community where police arrested us, where the only time they showed up was to apprehend. I also learned about it from being a public defender, a King County Superior Court judge, and working for two governors. So I’m not just spouting out political rhetoric to gain political points.”

Councilmember M. Lorena González, who also supports the project, has made a similar appeal, speaking of a cousin who she said was killed by police in California many years ago.

On Monday, Black Lives Matter protesters made it clear they weren’t convinced by the arguments.

Black Book Club organizer Palca Shibale meanwhile accused Juarez of “using identity politics to prop up police violence.” “Your identity politics do not go anywhere when it comes to supporting people of color, especially the indigenous community,” Shibale said. “You should be ashamed of yourself.”

Yet outside the racial critique of the project, its sheer cost—initially $88.5 million, then $160 million, and most recently $149 million—has made opposition multipartisan. Fiscal conservatives have lined up next to black radicals and together declared that $160 million, or anything close to it, is much too expensive for a police station. As commenter Omar Abdulalim said in June, “I’m not for the police not having a police station. Spend $20 million [on the new station], spend the rest on where it’s needed the most.”

Where is it needed the most? Commenters have floated a lot of ideas in the past two months, but one dominated: housing and homelessness.

Both Councilmembers Juarez and Tim Burgess objected when the Weekly asked them why the Council is spending money on police instead of housing, calling the question unfair and saying that the city should fund both—though they did not suggest specific ways to do so. “We have money set aside for [homelessness],” said Juarez, interviewed last week. “The way the city budget works, the way we raise money and the way we issue bonds, some money is restricted for capital projects, social services. You just have to make decisions sometimes. Yes, if I had a magic wand, I would say all $149 million could go to homelessness. But the world doesn’t work like that.”

But if that were on the table, you would vote yes? “I can’t. I can’t do that,” she said. “You’re trying to bring me into a false narrative, and I’m not going to bite. It’s like when people come in and say, ‘You’re not giving us money for mental health.’ I mean, we’re trying to do all of that within a budget and constraints.”

We pressed Burgess, pointing out that dozens of homeless people die in Seattle’s streets every year while only four Seattle police officers have been killed in the line of duty in the past 30 years. “False comparison,” he replied. “False dichotomy, and very inappropriate. If you extend the logic of your position there—should we disband the police department … because we want to divert that money to another good cause? I don’t think we have that luxury… . I don’t approach our budgeting or our public policy that way. We have to remain faithful to the city’s primary responsibility, which the city’s charter is very clear is public safety.”

By passing a resolution without a dollar figure, the City Council punted on the price tag for the North Precinct project. But come budget season in November, they’ll have to choose an actual dollar figure somewhere between $149 million and zilch. What that number is, or whether the Council punts again, depends largely on the protesters and activists whose outcry has already caused so much trouble for project proponents.

Mike O’Brien, the only dissenting vote against González’s resolution, explicitly credited Black Lives activists as changing his views. Responding to the criticism that he voted last year in favor of a city budget that included a $160 million North Precinct station, O’Brien said, “Things have changed since then.

“In light of the movement about Black Lives Matter that’s happening around this country, what the movement means to me is it’s calling on us to re-examine our assumptions. And the assumptions that I went into that [with] last year are different today.”

cjaywork@seattleweekly.com

More in News & Comment

Protestors gather at SeaTac’s Families Belong Together rally. Photo by Alex Garland
Seattle’s Separated Children

A local non-profit houses several immigrant youths who were separated from their parents at the border. But for how long?

Nikkita Oliver speaks at a July 17 No New Youth Jail press conference in front of the construction site of the King County Youth Detention Center. Photo by Josh Kelety
King County Youth Detention Center Moves Forward Despite Opposition

As community criticism of the project mounts, King County tries to take a middle road.

Trouble in Tacoma

A cannabis producer has been shut down for “numerous and substantial violations.”

Between Seattle’s $15 minimum wage and the new no-poach cause agreement, Washington has been leading the nation in advancing fast food workers’ rights. Photo by Fibonacci Blue/Flickr
Washington AG’s Deal Grants Mobility to Fast Food Workers Nationwide

Seven fast food chains have agreed to end no-poaching policies that economists say cause wage stagnation.

The Carlton Complex wildfire burned in north-central Washington state in 2014. Photo by Jason Kriess/Wikimedia Commons
King County Burn Ban Starts This Weekend

Other counties across the state have already enacted similar restrictions.

Numerous complaints against King County Sheriff’s deputies for issues like excessive force and improper search and seizure weren’t investigated due to internal misclassification, a new report says. Photo by Oran Viriyincy/Flickr
Report Finds Complaints Against King County Sheriff’s Deputies Weren’t Investigated

An outside review says that allegations of excessive force and racially-biased policing weren’t pursued.

Last spring, Sarah Smith (second from left) travelled to Tennessee to meet with other Brand New Congress candidates including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (right). Photo courtesy Brand New Congress
Can Sarah Smith Be Seattle’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?

The 30-year-old democratic socialist is challenging a long-serving incumbent in Washington’s 9th Congressional District.

Dianne Laurine (left) and Shaun Bickley (right), Commissioners for the Seattle Commission for People with Disabilities, say that the city didn’t consult with the disabled community prior to passing the straw ban. Photo by Melissa Hellmann
Straw Ban Leaves Disabled Community Feeling High and Dry

Although the city says that disabled people are exempted from the ban, the impacted community says that businesses haven’t gotten the message loud and clear.

Most Read