A precinct opponent addresses City Council Monday. Photo by Alex Garland

City Hall Needs to Stop Dismissing, and Start Addressing, Questions About the North Precinct

It’s time for the City Council to step back and do the hard work of selling the public on the pricey public project.

On Monday, the Seattle City Council voted, 7-1, to support the construction of a new police precinct building in North Seattle.

The resolution did not commit to a specific dollar amount for the building, leaving Councilmembers some room to challenge the Murray administration on the project’s cost when budgeting season comes around this fall. To that end, the resolution called for an independent review of its cost. And it called for a racial-equity study to investigate whether construction of the station would have an adverse affect on the city’s minorities.

The resolution sought to mollify the two major sources of opposition to the project: its status as a symbol of police power in an age of Black Lives Matter, and its price, which the Murray administration has pegged as high as $160 million. According to The Seattle Times, that would make it the most expensive police station in the country.

It didn’t work.

A mass demonstration against the project threw City Hall into chaos before, during, and after the vote. At one point, Councilmembers abandoned the dais amid chants of “Let them in!” as a surge of protesters who’d been corralled downstairs tried to rush their way into the already-full chamber. All this raucous protest made it clear (to anyone who still doubted) that the #BlocktheBunker movement is far more than just another piece of hashtag activism. It’s strong, it’s unified, and it demands answers. And whatever your thoughts on the North Precinct project in general—and even within our editorial board, there is a wide range of views—everyone in Seattle should be glad that someone is holding the Council’s feet to the fire on this massive project.

Until the #BlocktheBunker protests emerged in earnest this summer, the North Precinct plan was on bureaucratic autopilot, and few city officials seemed willing or able to get it in check. The justifications Councilmembers have cited for such a massive expenditure on a glistening building in Bitter Lake seem well-rehearsed: The project has been long in the works. The money has already been earmarked. It’s a “capital project,” which in City Hall-speak seems to mean “done deal.” Consequently, discussions about the project have had an air of budgetary fatalism.

Councilmember Debora Juarez in particular has bristled at any suggestion that the Council consider spending the $160 million the Murray administration believes is available for the project on other priorities. “I can’t go there,” she told Seattle Weekly’s Casey Jaywork when he asked whether this was the best use of city money right now.

Sorry, Councilmember, but ready or not, that’s where the conversation is going. #BlocktheBunker will make sure of it.

And thank goodness. Now that the building is no longer a fait accompli, the Council will have to step back and do the hard work of selling the public on it, rather than hiding behind budgetary constraints (which, it’s worth noting, they themselves created). We wish more government projects were subject to such public scrutiny.

The fact is that the Council can spend this money on things other than the North Precinct station, and there are tangible alternatives worth consideration. To name just one: homelessness. While Murray has been right to declare the crisis an emergency and release funds to address it, even he is quick to say that current funding (about $50 million annually) is not enough—that what’s needed is housing and money to build it. He usually looks south to Olympia or east to Washington, D.C., when he makes that point. Maybe he should have been looking north all along. $160 million can build an awful lot of public housing.

Or not. The point isn’t to decide right now where the city should expend its capital budget, but simply to remind our Councilmembers that they have the power to make a real choice here—or, rather, that they are making a real choice whether they like it or not. Instead of dismissing questions about spending the construction money elsewhere as an attempt to “politicize” the project—as Councilmember Tim Burgess also did when we asked him about redirecting the funds—they need to take these questions at face value. And then they need to answer them.

editorial@seattleweekly.com

More in News & Comment

Protestors gather at SeaTac’s Families Belong Together rally. Photo by Alex Garland
Seattle’s Separated Children

A local non-profit houses several immigrant youths who were separated from their parents at the border. But for how long?

Nikkita Oliver speaks at a July 17 No New Youth Jail press conference in front of the construction site of the King County Youth Detention Center. Photo by Josh Kelety
King County Youth Detention Center Moves Forward Despite Opposition

As community criticism of the project mounts, King County tries to take a middle road.

Trouble in Tacoma

A cannabis producer has been shut down for “numerous and substantial violations.”

Between Seattle’s $15 minimum wage and the new no-poach cause agreement, Washington has been leading the nation in advancing fast food workers’ rights. Photo by Fibonacci Blue/Flickr
Washington AG’s Deal Grants Mobility to Fast Food Workers Nationwide

Seven fast food chains have agreed to end no-poaching policies that economists say cause wage stagnation.

The Carlton Complex wildfire burned in north-central Washington state in 2014. Photo by Jason Kriess/Wikimedia Commons
King County Burn Ban Starts This Weekend

Other counties across the state have already enacted similar restrictions.

Numerous complaints against King County Sheriff’s deputies for issues like excessive force and improper search and seizure weren’t investigated due to internal misclassification, a new report says. Photo by Oran Viriyincy/Flickr
Report Finds Complaints Against King County Sheriff’s Deputies Weren’t Investigated

An outside review says that allegations of excessive force and racially-biased policing weren’t pursued.

Last spring, Sarah Smith (second from left) travelled to Tennessee to meet with other Brand New Congress candidates including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (right). Photo courtesy Brand New Congress
Can Sarah Smith Be Seattle’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?

The 30-year-old democratic socialist is challenging a long-serving incumbent in Washington’s 9th Congressional District.

Dianne Laurine (left) and Shaun Bickley (right), Commissioners for the Seattle Commission for People with Disabilities, say that the city didn’t consult with the disabled community prior to passing the straw ban. Photo by Melissa Hellmann
Straw Ban Leaves Disabled Community Feeling High and Dry

Although the city says that disabled people are exempted from the ban, the impacted community says that businesses haven’t gotten the message loud and clear.

Most Read