
Annie Marie Musselman
Around 11:30 a.m. on July 25, 2001, Su Wilson found her 16-year-old daughter, Megan, lying in bed at their Kenmore home, her chest heaving. "Megan, get up! You have to use your medication," Su recalls telling her daughter, who suffered from chronic asthma. According to her mother's recollections, Megan rose from her bed and used a device called a nebulizer, which transmitted a medicinal vapor to her lungs. When that didn't work, Su called Megan's primary care physician, a Kirkland naturopath named Lucinda Messer.
One critical fact about that day is in dispute. Messer says that she repeatedly urged Megan and her mother to go to the hospital—and they refused. It's noted on the medical chart from that day. But Su Wilson insists Messer never mentioned the hospital.
In any case, these things seem clear: Several hours after Megan woke up, she and her mother arrived at Messer's office, which at the time was across the street from Evergreen Hospital. Messer was busy with another client, so an acupuncturist who worked out of the office, Dan Brown, performed acupuncture on Megan. Messer then treated Megan with a shot of vitamin B-12 and an herbal remedy called a tincture.
What Messer did not do was perform tests used by conventional medical doctors to determine the severity of an asthmatic attack and whether a patient needs to receive emergency care. There is no consensus on whether such tests should be a part of naturopathic care. But most medical doctors agree that they are essential. "The very basics were not done with this child," says Robert Baratz, a Massachusetts internist and critic of alternative medicine who reviewed documents related to the case at the request of Seattle Weekly.
Megan and her mother went home. Some time later, with Megan still struggling to breathe, her father, Arnold Wilson, took her to Lakeshore Clinic. She lost consciousness as they drove into the parking lot and never recovered. Megan Wilson, a pretty, easygoing teenager with long, dark hair and Chinese features inherited from her mother, was pronounced dead at 6:43 p.m., the summer before her junior year of high school. She died of an attack that almost certainly would not have been fatal had she received standard hospital treatment.
The state Department of Health is investigating Messer. Unwilling to release details of an open investigation, the agency will not confirm whether the Megan Wilson case is at issue. But the timing of the investigation, launched in November, coincides with an anonymous letter the Department of Health received outlining the circumstances of Megan's death. The case also resulted in a lawsuit by the girl's parents against Messer and Brown.
It is a landmark case for alternative medicine in this state, both because of the tragic outcome and because it raises important questions about the standard of care to which alternative practitioners should be held.
It also reflects a new era in naturopathy, a field which, simply put, believes in using nature to heal nature. Home to the country's most prominent school of alternative medicine, Bastyr University in Kenmore, Washington is one of only 14 states plus the District of Columbia that licenses naturopaths. In 1993, as part of a sweeping health care reform package, the state passed a law requiring insurance companies to cover services rendered by all types of licensed health care providers, including naturopaths. The move prompted several insurance plans to proffer naturopaths as primary care providers. Regence BlueShield did so. So did Boeing, which is self-insured and is where Megan's father works the graveyard shift as a heating and refrigeration technician.
Once confined largely to providing care that supplements treatment by medical doctors, naturopaths increasingly have become the first person to which patients in all kinds of distress will turn. In April, the Legislature strengthened naturopaths' primary care role by expanding their authority to prescribe drugs, including controlled substances such as codeine and testosterone.
The backing by the state and insurance companies has fueled naturopathy's growth. Numbering in the dozens only a few decades ago locally, naturopaths now claim 700 license holders statewide.
"My case was the first case in Washington where natural medicine was tried—and nobody knew what they were doing," Messer says. Actually, the case never reached trial. It was settled in 2003 for a confidential amount that Messer says was around $250,000 or $300,000. Messer's insurance company never reported the settlement to the state Department of Health, as required by state law.
Messer herself, however, reported the case to the Naturopathic Physicians Board of Medical Examiners in Arizona, where she is also licensed. The board dismissed the case. Looking through the case file now, its executive director, Craig Runbeck, realizes that the board seemed to have considered only information supplied by Messer.
"It's crap, bullshit stuff," Messer says of the Wilsons' charges of negligence. She asserts that it's the Wilsons who are guilty of negligence for shunning conventional medical help. "There was so much neglect here," she says. If patients ignore your advice, she asks, "What do you do? What do you do?"
Su and Arnold Wilson, who maintain that Messer never dispensed life-saving advice, see things differently. "She did not know how to handle an emergency situation," Su Wilson says of Messer. Indeed, Su believes that neither Messer nor anybody else at her office realized that this was a life-and-death situation. "Nobody took it seriously," Su says.






















Reader Comments
In her article, Ms Shapiro complains about naturopathic training, focusing on how there is no mandatory residency program. She, quotes off-hand comments about how important residency was for some medical doctors, but fails to mention that the training of naturopathic physicians includes graduation from an institution that is accredited by organizations recognized by the U. S. Department of Education, how it includes both classroom and clinical training, and how it meets the stringent requirements of the State of Washington Department of Health. She also neglects to include how naturopathic graduates must pass national board exams prior to licensure, and how the education, training and licensure of naturopathic physicians has been determined by numerous expert bodies to be consistent with the practice of naturopathic medicine in this state.
Ms Shapiro then takes exception with naturopathic medicine functioning under it own standards of practice using quotes including: “There can’t be a double standard.” She fails to mention that, in the treatment of asthma, the naturopathic standards are very similar to conventional medical standards. Naturopathic protocols include limiting allergens and other asthma triggers as well as the use of nutrition, botanicals and other adjuncts to help the patient’s overall status, and that it is agreed that a naturopathic physician (just as a medical primary care physician) must immediately refer to a medical specialist or the ER without hesitation when appropriate. Every health care profession has its own standards based on tried and true regulatory process. Naturopathic Medicine, in this respect, is no different.
Ms Shapiro then criticizes: “In investigating naturopaths, however, the Department of Health consults only their peers, not medical doctors.” She fails to mention that all health care professions utilize peer regulation in Washington State in a process managed and directed by the State of Washington Department of Health. The inference that disciplinary determinations are made without expert knowledge is simply untrue. The Department of Health can and does secure all of the necessary expert data before reaching a determination in a disciplinary matter regardless of where the expert comes from. If the case Ms. Shapiro mentions is in the state disciplinary process you can be certain that a fair and knowledgeable determination will be forthcoming.
Ms Shapiro then assaults the scientific credibility of naturopathic medicine with the off-hand quote “Many naturopathic interventions are poorly supported by science”. In fact, conventional medicine, naturopathic medicine and all other health care professions include treatments that are well studied, and some that are not. Many traditional therapies that have provided long-term safe and consistent outcomes have not been subject to clinical trials. This applies to conventional medicine, naturopathic medicine and virtually every other health care practice. We are all moving toward increasing clinical trials with evidence-based treatment models. In fact, naturopathic medicine does have a strong evidence-based component, and it is unfair to characterize the naturopathic profession & naturopathic practice based on a single quote without facts.
Millions of Americans use natural medicine every day with documented success. And, naturopathic physicians, who have led the safe and effective delivery of these treatments in Washington State for more than 90 years, have among the best safety record of any profession in our state. Naturopathic Medicine meets the highest standards of education, training, licensure, regulation and safety. It is not reasonable to try to discredit this profession’s high standards and exceptional safety record using opinions and quotes without facts or balancing data. Nor is it reasonable to condemn a profession because it is not conventional medicine. We are different even though we share many treatments, and therefore we use standards and protocols that are consistent with our unique practice. We provide safe, effective, evidence-based treatments that are not part of conventional medicine just as conventional providers provide safe, effective care that is different from what we provide. Our standards are not lesser because they are different. In fact, contrary to the tone of Ms Shapiro’s article, naturopathic physicians enjoy a close, cooperative relationship with medical physicians in our state in part because we strive to maintain the highest standards.
Kasra Pournadeali, ND, President,
Washington Association of Naturopathic Physicians
21 June 2005