The Veterinarian Who Seemed to Hate Animals: State Charges Peter Rule with Abusing Patients

sad dog.jpg
UPDATE: Peter Rule responds. Details after the jump.

What kind of veterinarian punches animals in the face? Or taunts them by growling at them? Or, worse yet, tightens his hand around a dog's neck until it loses a consciousness?

*See Also: Just One of Those Things

A very, very bad one, obviously, and quite possibly one who's more than a little sick. Ferndale's Peter Rule might be just such a veterinarian if charges levied against him by the state Department of Health are true.

We wrote about Rule a couple years ago in a cover story on pet owners who are taking veterinarians to court over perceived mistreatment of their beloved, four-legged family members. In most of the cases described, pet owners simply perceived that their animals had not received adequate care. Sadism typically wasn't involved.

But Rule was a different story. In 2009, animal rights lawyer Adam Karp filed a complaint with the DOH that cited employees of Rule who claimed that their boss deliberately manhandled animals. Here's what one staffer said, quoted in the complaint:

Once, in or around 2007, a Chihuahua was terrorized in the cage by doctor. Dr. was banging on the cage door, growling at the dog, jumping toward it, trying to get the dog worked up. When he pulled the dog out of the cage, it snapped and growled at Dr. Rule who then started choking the dog on the table. The dog was lying on its side. He put his hand around the dog's neck and choked it to the point that it passed out. Dr. Rule said he learned this as a way to get an animal under control. I was shaking from witnessing this episode.

Finally, just last month, DOH's State Veterinary Board of Governors released a statement of charges that mirrors many of the claims in Karp's complaint. It accuses Rule of "physically and psychologically abusing patients."

But that's not all. The board also says that Rule allowed, and in one case pressured, unlicensed assistants to perform surgery. That's strictly verboten, as far as DOH rules are concerned. Then again, it apparently wasn't so great when Rule was wielding the knife either.

Accusing Rule of providing substandard care, the statement says that, in one case, Rule nicked the spleen of a dog named Daisy. She started to bleed. Rule couldn't control it. And Daisy bled to death.

His skills in surgery, not to mention his attitude toward his patients, might have something to with his habit of dipping into the clinic's stock of the pain-reliever Tramadol, according to employees cited in the statement of charges.

Rule couldn't be reached for comment yesterday. In a conversation with SW in 2010, he denied abusing his patients and providing inadequate care.

Update: In a conversation with SW today, Rule says that the accusations of abuse "grossly twisted what actually happened." In the incident with the Chihuahua, for instance, he says he was not choking the dog but merely holding the animal "in the only safe place" possible while putting a muzzle on it. The employee who said she was traumatized by the alleged choking continued to bring her dog to him, Rule adds.

The veterinarian also denies letting assistants perform surgery, and says that while he at one point took Tramadol without a prescription, it did not interfere with his surgical performance.

"I'm not saying I don't make mistakes," he concedes, however, accepting responsibility for the death of Daisy.

 
comments powered by Disqus