qwestfield2.jpg

Martin Duke at Seattle Transit Blog thinks they should . The University is asking for the redirection of $150 million in tourism taxes to repair

"/>

Should the Huskies Play at Qwest Field?

qwestfield2.jpg

Martin Duke at Seattle Transit Blog thinks they should. The University is asking for the redirection of $150 million in tourism taxes to repair Husky Stadium, which is located above what will soon be a light rail station. Writes Duke,

[T]here are far too many productive uses for this land to have it house a

stadium used at most 6 or 7 times a year and a giant surface parking

lot.  If the UW didn't want to build anything there to make the lives

of their students and employees easier, simply selling the whole thing

to a developer would probably patch that hole in the endowment pretty

well.

I grew up going to Husky football games and have many fond memories of the stadium, but Duke's argument makes sense. Obviously, it's the University's land to do with what it likes. But it certainly seems like the school and the region could derive a lot more benefit from other uses.

UW President Mark Emmert addresses the Qwest question on his funding plea site, noting that moving the team to Qwest would cut UW's share of game revenue--the biggest source of funding for its athletic department--and create scheduling difficulties. (Most notably, the Sounders also play on Saturdays.)

But my favorite justification for UW's objection to the move is this one:
University athletics are under the umbrella of the broader academic

programs and mission of the university. Moving these games from campus

to a professional facility would weaken these ties and send the wrong

message about the interconnectedness of athletics and academics.

If you believe that, my friend Bernie Madoff has a great investment he'd love for you to be a part of.

 
comments powered by Disqus