Top

news

Stories

 

Cover Story: Washington’s Candy Land of Tax Breaks

As our cash-strapped state prepares to cut services for the poor and mentally ill, billions of dollars in tax breaks and exemptions are still being doled out.

Similarly, "Air pollution control equipment that is constructed or installed at a thermal electric generating facility" is exempt from property tax. That would be the Centralia coal-fired steam plant, worth a couple million every couple years. The plant is also exempt from sales tax on the coal it buys, but because of those confidentiality rules, says DOR, it can't reveal the amount of the exemption. We've learned it's about $12 million biennially, dating to 1997.

The cheap-energy-gobbling "aluminum smelting industry" gets lots of breaks, starting with property taxes. Smelters are effectively reimbursed through a tax credit in the same amount. There are also exemptions on personal property, construction, and use of natural gas, along with credits for pollution control. Again, names and amounts aren't listed. But we learned elsewhere those breaks are worth more than $3 million biennially to the state's two smelters, Alcoa Inc.'s plants in Ferndale and Wenatchee. The property-tax credits, created in 2004, are to expire in 2012, but a bill has already been introduced to extend them five more years.

Under a B&O tax break for advertising sold to out-of-state buyers, radio and TV stations are deducting $2.7 million every two years. The newspaper industry—particularly the publishers who, unlike freebie Seattle Weekly, for example, sell their print product for hard cash on the street or by subscription—get in on the exemptions too. The sales aren't taxed, mainly to "recognize the practical problem of collecting sales tax on individual sales of about a nickel, the typical price of a newspaper in 1935," the DOR report says. "Arguments have also been made in the past that newspaper carriers (mostly youth) should not have to be responsible for collecting and reporting the tax."

Though billing functions have now largely been centralized and computerized by the publishers, and kids delivering papers on their bikes are long gone, the exemptions continue. The Seattle Times, as the state's largest newspaper, presumably gets the largest benefit from the roughly $25 million that publishers (and their print readers) aren't paying over two-year sales periods.

Seattle Weekly and other papers, particularly the Times, benefit from additional media-tax breaks. About a dozen papers in all save a collective $1.2 million on sales taxes when buying new computers, as of 2004. And an exemption passed just last year cut the state B&O tax by 40 percent for newspapers. It was approved as the industry fought off death spasms. Times publisher Frank Blethen pleaded with lawmakers, saying he and other publishers were "hanging on by our fingers," while his rival, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, folded its 146-year-old print edition. Other publications cut staff and teetered on the edge of bankruptcy. Nonetheless, the exemption means at least $2.6 million less going to the state every two years.

The DOR's exemption list indicates that most every living soul directly or indirectly benefits. About 4,800 insurance agents collectively avoid paying $40 million in B&O taxes on their commissions each biennium. About 450 travel agents and tour operators don't pay $16 million in B&O taxes. When any of us buy prescription drugs, we collectively avoid paying $613 million in sales taxes that have been exempted. It's an exhausting, all-inclusive club.

Legislators are unlikely to touch mass-appeal exemptions. A more likely target could be something like the $1.1 million break given in 1982 to international banking institutions that establish offices here. Similarly, there might not be agreement to reverse a longtime small-boat owners' excise-tax exemption that could produce $4 million. But might lawmakers ding people from out of state who buy a boat here and aren't charged retail sales tax? That's a biennial $10 million exemption.

There's $12 million sitting there from a 2006 B&O exemption given the carbonated-beverage-syrup industry. Since 1993, microbreweries haven't had to pay $3 per barrel in beer excise tax, saving them $7 million every couple of years. Farmers get a bounty of longtime exemptions—more than $200 million in farm-product tax breaks alone. There's also an $89 million break on the feed and seed they buy, and $88 million on fertilizer and chemical-spray purchases. More than $13 million in taxes are not paid on new parts for their tractors and other machinery.

Even chickens benefit: Farmers collectively save $1.4 million on taxes when they use natural gas to heat poultry barns. They avoid paying another $360,000 when buying bedding for their birds.

Fowl as that might sound, however, the issue for Olympia is sacred cows.

Any major exemption repeals would be a course change for the legislature, which has been adding breaks at the rate of more than a dozen each year. Repeal may be in the air, but more than two dozen new exemption bills have already been offered this session. They include breaks to aid seniors and the disabled. But more common are the proposed business exemptions, including new give-backs for rural data centers, medical-equipment firms, electric-car owners, and producers of hog fuel used to generate energy.

Supporters say many of the breaks are needed to counter a sucking economy and rocketing unemployment. But that's also an argument for repealing some of that $15 billion jackpot, says Rep. Kelley, the exemptions-review committee chair.

"In this tough economic climate, we realize that we are competing with other states and need to make sure we create a climate to help make Washington businesses successful," he notes."On the other hand, we are not in the business of giving tax breaks to one group at the expense of another group or the public at large."

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next Page >>
 
  • Steven Jager 04/14/2010 2:00:00 AM

    Yes, of course, it is our money and these "tax breaks" keep it from being returned to us. Or, perhaps, as some radically believe, it is actually THEIR money and there are policy incentives to let them keep it. It is such an upside down attitude and there is this perpetually silly and angry belief that we just need to go take it from the big bad employers, and the big bad rich people and all will be well. And public employee unions, with their oversized pension liabilities, and lack of accountability, scream loudest. Please, do not trot out the police and firefighters as poster children for that entire economic sector. Putting your life on the line merits a different, and well earned, level of respect. It is the entities and people who pay the least that demand, of those that pay the most, more, masking their envy and self interest in the guise of a higher moral plane.

  • Rodney C. Hermes 03/18/2010 3:17:00 AM

    School Funding – Our race to the bottom I noted in a recent article in a Seattle newspaper (The Weekly February 3-9 2010) a reported conversation between Governor Gregoire and former Governor Rosillini on the occasion of his 100th birthday. He said: “Go with your heart on taxes. Do what is best for everyone”. It took me back fifty years to when I was a young teacher in Walla Walla and Albert Rosellini was there campaigning for governor. I so clearly recall his saying that Washington has always been 12th or 13th in the nation in support of education (dollars per student) and that if he was elected governor, we will not fall from this level of support. Fast forward fifty years. We are now forty-second nationally and charging downward. In my almost forty years in education – half of them as a school superintendent – I experienced our continual slide. Each legislative session it seemed the same. The legislature would come out of session having enacted some new program or requirement, but not enough money. They would then return home to extol all they had done for education. It seems people keep believing. Even after a Supreme Court decision in the 1970’s requiring “full funding” and an honoring of the constitutional requirement that education is the states’ “paramount responsibility”; we kept slipping nationally in comparative funding with class sizes going up and salaries going down. Now another court decision saying the constitutional mandate is being ignored by the legislature. The response? I suspect the same games will be in play; all while our politicians continue to proclaim their actions as promoting excellence. In truth, any excellence we experience is almost totally thanks to our dedicated teachers. Wow! We can’t even get it together to apply for the millions we might try for in Federal “Race to the top” grants. At least we only have eight more slots to go in our “race to the bottom”. It’s to the shame of our legislators for letting us slip so far in the past fifty years. It’s to our shame for letting them convince us they seek excellence while they fund quite the opposite. It’s also to our shame that we don’t demand and approve a system of funding that meets our constitutional mandate. Happy 100th Governor Albert Rosellini. Since your time in office, during good times and bad, we have continued our downward slide. We are winning the race to the bottom! Rodney C. Hermes, Ed D. Redmond

  • Michael Schuyler 03/09/2010 11:59:00 PM

    So you are saying that it is a 'loophole' that my bank account is not assessed a property tax? Think about this for a minute. You get a paycheck and have to pay 'property' taxes on it? Isn't that an income tax? Does anyone think this is a 'loophole' that should be closed? Or is this idea just another avenue for thievery by the state?

  • Charles 02/13/2010 5:42:00 AM

    Great article!Corporate Welfare in the Evergreen State is rampant and we need to do something about it now!Gregoire won't because she's rich;a progressive state income tax would 'hurt' her waaay more than it woul the bottom 95% of the workforce.

  • Tigress 02/11/2010 8:55:00 PM

    Hey, dont be so quick to jump on the anti-tax break train so quickly. Because of those tax breaks, some of you readers who work for 'a company that produces planes in Washington' or 'a health-maintenance organization (that rhymes with Group Health)' have jobs BECAUSE OF those tax breaks. So dont be so quick to throw the baby out with the bathwater! I'm not an outright supporter of giving money to millionaires (and Im a liberal), but the ugly truth is there is always another state, um lets say South Carolina as mentioned, or the state where I grew up Mississippi, that are poorer and willing to solicit jobs away from us. Its a race to the bottom and its a global economy now, hellooo! The Republicans always talk about less taxes - thats because most of the industry in their counties GET HUGE BREAKS ALREADY! Agriculture, a rural-data center (?) - those are in uh, rural areas, i.e. anywhere besides Seattle/Tacoma. So, lets connect the dots; would you rather pay more for tax on your groceries like other states OR scream at the legislature when they repeal that tax break and your Coke costs more? Choose your poision.

  • RA 02/08/2010 10:43:00 PM

    That tax rally at the state capitol, mentioned in the thread here, is actually planned for next Monday, noon on President's Day, outside the state capitol.

  • Just A Cog-noscenti In The Mac 02/06/2010 3:03:00 AM

    Just a brief note on the JLARC/CCPMTP review process. (Full disclosure: I am a part of the "lumbering bureaucratic process") It's important to understand what recommendations by JLARC and the CCPMTP actually mean, how they are different, and how they relate to the legislative process. JLARC recommendations are limited to evaluating whether an exemption is actually working, not whether it's a good idea. They are charged with figuring out whether the exemption is actually doing what the Legislature intended... even if the Legislature's goals were no more noble than "give Boeing a tax break." CCPMTP then adds a policy perspective. They can comment on whether the underlying policy is good or bad in their opinion. They are generally looking at one exemption at a time, however, so they aren't really capable of making complex balancing calculations. An exemption has to be a bad policy in and of itself to merit a negative review. Both JLARC and the CCPMTP act to identify the really low hanging fruit...the broken, the ill-advised, or the utterly incomprehensible. Usually, however, there is at least a grain of good intentions in these tax breaks. Hopefully that explains how 50 of the 75 were given a positive recommendation. Ultimately it is up to the legislators to make the really tough choices...that's what we elected them to do. Things are often more complicated than they appear at first glance, and legislators are often more timid or corrupt than we'd care for. Which one predominates I leave to you. Further reading: two big tax bills were introduced on the day this article came out: Sentate Bill 6841 (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=6841&year=2009) and House Bill 3176 (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=3176&year=2009)

  • AFSE 02/05/2010 10:38:00 PM

    The federation of state employees - thousands of them - will be rallying outside the capitol building Monday around noon to insist legislators repeal some of these tax breaks. Be there!

  • Donna Hardy 02/04/2010 8:45:00 PM

    "Greg Devereux, the state employees' federation leader, says don't bank on a tax-break revolution yet. "The exemptions are a perpetual-motion machine," siphoning off more would-be revenue with each new session, he observes, "and no one's willing to step in front of it." Nailed it! It would take balls for lawmakers to go against the wishes of their wealthy campaign supporters.

  • RBolson 02/04/2010 7:39:00 PM

    Yesterday the Democrats announced their new budget saving plan. They are going to raise taxes on the rest of us.

  • Jim DeBlasio 02/04/2010 11:14:00 AM

    Thank you Rick Anderson and the Weekly for trying to expose this material. Washington has the most regressive tax system in the United States, people feel like they are paying too much because they are! The Democrats need to get a spine and take on big agriculture and big business. If they raise the sales tax again, like they just did in Massachusetts, the Democrats and Republicans may find themselves voted out in favor of populist demogogues.

  • Jay Graham 02/04/2010 1:04:00 AM

    Someone in Olympia has to get serious about these breaks, especially in this economy. If as much as $15 billion can be generated - or hell, a couple billion - by retiring some of these handouts it is morally indefensible not to do it. We don't have the funds we need to help the mentally ill and run our justice systems - but we can give all this candy to billionaires? Olympia, do you have a conscience?

 

Most Popular Stories


Now Click This

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy