Top

news

Stories

 

Cover Story: Washington’s Candy Land of Tax Breaks

As our cash-strapped state prepares to cut services for the poor and mentally ill, billions of dollars in tax breaks and exemptions are still being doled out.

"Right now," says Greg Devereux, the federation's executive director, "it seems state workers and teachers are the targets" of budget-cutters. "Our mantra is there should be shared sacrifices. But we're easy targets. Rather than piss off a hundred groups, just piss off two. They don't think they need us to get re-elected."

If they want his vote, Devereux says, they'll sacrifice some tax-exempt fat cats, whose identities are something of a secret in Olympia.

We can't tell you who specifically gets how much in official Washington tax breaks. That's a secret, says DOR spokesperson Mike Gowrylow. "State law prohibits us from discussing the tax situation of any particular company," he says."Just like the IRS won't give me your tax return if I ask them for it."

In addition, it's illegal for the state to extend credit to a single private entity, so when legislators draw up the laws, they come up with more generic identifiers.

Also, if fewer than three would-be taxpayers could benefit from a given break, the DOR usually won't identify the amount of unpaid taxes covered by that exemption. That's because deducing the identity of the company or organization involved wouldn't be much of a challenge, and you could therefore also figure out how big a break they're getting.

A certain "manufacturer of commercial airplanes," for example, gets a $150 million tax break every two years under one of the exemptions. Another $45 million is granted for "Airplane pre-production costs."

The "manufacturer" exemption was passed in 2003 "to encourage the assembly of a super-efficient airplane in Washington." That would be the new 787 Dreamliner, the prize up for grabs in the Boeing Co.'s Best Bribe Sweepstakes, available in the lower 48 states. Victory went to the governor offering the greatest tax breaks and other kickbacks. Then-Gov. Gary Locke threw open our state's safe after hiring Boeing's own consultant to advise him. With lawmakers' approval, he doled out $3.2 billion in exemptions and credits to the Chicago-based aerospace giant, spread over 20 years.

Other Olympia incentives granted to the company and the aerospace industry will ultimately save Boeing an estimated $1 billion more over the years, according to Seattle Weekly calculations. Reversing any of those exemptions would make the company howl and threaten to move to whatever state it hasn't already threatened to move to. But didn't Boeing renege on the deal anyway? Last year it agreed to build a second 787 assembly plant—in South Carolina—after Gregoire balked at handing out any new tax breaks here. Carolina lawmakers approved $170 million in Boeing incentives and exemptions that were quickly signed into law by the state's philandering governor, Mark Sanford. (Just back from visiting his Argentine mistress, he had his own incentive, dangling as he was over the maw of impeachment).

Deferral of state and local retail sales and use taxes are also allowed for the construction of buildings for high-tech projects involving research and development. That has Microsoft and its ever-expanding campus written all over it, allowing MS to avoid sales tax on construction costs, materials, and new equipment, for example. Another 500 small and large companies also benefit, says the state. The exemption was created in 1994 and extended in 2004 for another 10 years. Over a decade, that's $650 million the state is not raking in.

Almost 1,700 high-tech firms also share another $50 million in B&O tax credits for research and development under an exemption that was also renewed in 2004 for another decade. And a $12 million property-tax break goes to companies that use custom computer software.

Microsoft, incidentally, has also avoided paying a ton of state taxes by moving offshore, so to speak. According to writer and ex-Microsoftie Jeff Reifman, Microsoft opened a small Nevada office in 1997 to record software-licensing revenue and skirt Washington's half-percent wholesale tax on software-licensing royalties. Reifman estimates that has helped the company of billionaires Bill Gates and Paul Allen avoid more than $700 million in Washington taxes. With interest and penalties, the total exceeds $1 billion.

Allen, the world's richest sports mogul, gets other breaks here, too. Besides enlisting state taxpayers to help build his Seattle football stadium, and receiving county tax cuts, Allen's Seahawks and the Seattle Mariners have each benefited from sales-tax exemptions on the cost of stadium construction. The franchises, along with the state commissions that operate the stadiums for them, avoided paying around $50 million in taxes over 10 years. Though they've now begun to pick up the tab in annual increments, that's money that could already be in the state's vaults.

Health-maintenance organizations (rhymes with Group Health), along with the major health-care insurers, are exempt from paying almost $300 million every two years in B&O tax on insurance premiums, under a break dating back to 1993. They also don't pay $40 million every two years on Medicare premium taxes that could have gone to the state. The insurers are also exempt from $25 million in dental premium taxes. As of 2006, about 100 unnamed hospitals also get $6 million in B&O credits for buying patient-lifting devices.

Here's a real toughie: A tax exemption is provided to unnamed "Persons who conduct horse racing events that are licensed by the State Horse Racing Commission." Since, as the state reveals in a footnote, "Emerald Downs is the only track currently in operation," we'll guess that's the place they mean. The privately owned track, opened in 1996, is allowed to avoid about $4.3 million in biennial B&O taxes.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next Page >>
 
  • Steven Jager 04/14/2010 2:00:00 AM

    Yes, of course, it is our money and these "tax breaks" keep it from being returned to us. Or, perhaps, as some radically believe, it is actually THEIR money and there are policy incentives to let them keep it. It is such an upside down attitude and there is this perpetually silly and angry belief that we just need to go take it from the big bad employers, and the big bad rich people and all will be well. And public employee unions, with their oversized pension liabilities, and lack of accountability, scream loudest. Please, do not trot out the police and firefighters as poster children for that entire economic sector. Putting your life on the line merits a different, and well earned, level of respect. It is the entities and people who pay the least that demand, of those that pay the most, more, masking their envy and self interest in the guise of a higher moral plane.

  • Rodney C. Hermes 03/18/2010 3:17:00 AM

    School Funding – Our race to the bottom I noted in a recent article in a Seattle newspaper (The Weekly February 3-9 2010) a reported conversation between Governor Gregoire and former Governor Rosillini on the occasion of his 100th birthday. He said: “Go with your heart on taxes. Do what is best for everyone”. It took me back fifty years to when I was a young teacher in Walla Walla and Albert Rosellini was there campaigning for governor. I so clearly recall his saying that Washington has always been 12th or 13th in the nation in support of education (dollars per student) and that if he was elected governor, we will not fall from this level of support. Fast forward fifty years. We are now forty-second nationally and charging downward. In my almost forty years in education – half of them as a school superintendent – I experienced our continual slide. Each legislative session it seemed the same. The legislature would come out of session having enacted some new program or requirement, but not enough money. They would then return home to extol all they had done for education. It seems people keep believing. Even after a Supreme Court decision in the 1970’s requiring “full funding” and an honoring of the constitutional requirement that education is the states’ “paramount responsibility”; we kept slipping nationally in comparative funding with class sizes going up and salaries going down. Now another court decision saying the constitutional mandate is being ignored by the legislature. The response? I suspect the same games will be in play; all while our politicians continue to proclaim their actions as promoting excellence. In truth, any excellence we experience is almost totally thanks to our dedicated teachers. Wow! We can’t even get it together to apply for the millions we might try for in Federal “Race to the top” grants. At least we only have eight more slots to go in our “race to the bottom”. It’s to the shame of our legislators for letting us slip so far in the past fifty years. It’s to our shame for letting them convince us they seek excellence while they fund quite the opposite. It’s also to our shame that we don’t demand and approve a system of funding that meets our constitutional mandate. Happy 100th Governor Albert Rosellini. Since your time in office, during good times and bad, we have continued our downward slide. We are winning the race to the bottom! Rodney C. Hermes, Ed D. Redmond

  • Michael Schuyler 03/09/2010 11:59:00 PM

    So you are saying that it is a 'loophole' that my bank account is not assessed a property tax? Think about this for a minute. You get a paycheck and have to pay 'property' taxes on it? Isn't that an income tax? Does anyone think this is a 'loophole' that should be closed? Or is this idea just another avenue for thievery by the state?

  • Charles 02/13/2010 5:42:00 AM

    Great article!Corporate Welfare in the Evergreen State is rampant and we need to do something about it now!Gregoire won't because she's rich;a progressive state income tax would 'hurt' her waaay more than it woul the bottom 95% of the workforce.

  • Tigress 02/11/2010 8:55:00 PM

    Hey, dont be so quick to jump on the anti-tax break train so quickly. Because of those tax breaks, some of you readers who work for 'a company that produces planes in Washington' or 'a health-maintenance organization (that rhymes with Group Health)' have jobs BECAUSE OF those tax breaks. So dont be so quick to throw the baby out with the bathwater! I'm not an outright supporter of giving money to millionaires (and Im a liberal), but the ugly truth is there is always another state, um lets say South Carolina as mentioned, or the state where I grew up Mississippi, that are poorer and willing to solicit jobs away from us. Its a race to the bottom and its a global economy now, hellooo! The Republicans always talk about less taxes - thats because most of the industry in their counties GET HUGE BREAKS ALREADY! Agriculture, a rural-data center (?) - those are in uh, rural areas, i.e. anywhere besides Seattle/Tacoma. So, lets connect the dots; would you rather pay more for tax on your groceries like other states OR scream at the legislature when they repeal that tax break and your Coke costs more? Choose your poision.

  • RA 02/08/2010 10:43:00 PM

    That tax rally at the state capitol, mentioned in the thread here, is actually planned for next Monday, noon on President's Day, outside the state capitol.

  • Just A Cog-noscenti In The Mac 02/06/2010 3:03:00 AM

    Just a brief note on the JLARC/CCPMTP review process. (Full disclosure: I am a part of the "lumbering bureaucratic process") It's important to understand what recommendations by JLARC and the CCPMTP actually mean, how they are different, and how they relate to the legislative process. JLARC recommendations are limited to evaluating whether an exemption is actually working, not whether it's a good idea. They are charged with figuring out whether the exemption is actually doing what the Legislature intended... even if the Legislature's goals were no more noble than "give Boeing a tax break." CCPMTP then adds a policy perspective. They can comment on whether the underlying policy is good or bad in their opinion. They are generally looking at one exemption at a time, however, so they aren't really capable of making complex balancing calculations. An exemption has to be a bad policy in and of itself to merit a negative review. Both JLARC and the CCPMTP act to identify the really low hanging fruit...the broken, the ill-advised, or the utterly incomprehensible. Usually, however, there is at least a grain of good intentions in these tax breaks. Hopefully that explains how 50 of the 75 were given a positive recommendation. Ultimately it is up to the legislators to make the really tough choices...that's what we elected them to do. Things are often more complicated than they appear at first glance, and legislators are often more timid or corrupt than we'd care for. Which one predominates I leave to you. Further reading: two big tax bills were introduced on the day this article came out: Sentate Bill 6841 (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=6841&year=2009) and House Bill 3176 (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=3176&year=2009)

  • AFSE 02/05/2010 10:38:00 PM

    The federation of state employees - thousands of them - will be rallying outside the capitol building Monday around noon to insist legislators repeal some of these tax breaks. Be there!

  • Donna Hardy 02/04/2010 8:45:00 PM

    "Greg Devereux, the state employees' federation leader, says don't bank on a tax-break revolution yet. "The exemptions are a perpetual-motion machine," siphoning off more would-be revenue with each new session, he observes, "and no one's willing to step in front of it." Nailed it! It would take balls for lawmakers to go against the wishes of their wealthy campaign supporters.

  • RBolson 02/04/2010 7:39:00 PM

    Yesterday the Democrats announced their new budget saving plan. They are going to raise taxes on the rest of us.

  • Jim DeBlasio 02/04/2010 11:14:00 AM

    Thank you Rick Anderson and the Weekly for trying to expose this material. Washington has the most regressive tax system in the United States, people feel like they are paying too much because they are! The Democrats need to get a spine and take on big agriculture and big business. If they raise the sales tax again, like they just did in Massachusetts, the Democrats and Republicans may find themselves voted out in favor of populist demogogues.

  • Jay Graham 02/04/2010 1:04:00 AM

    Someone in Olympia has to get serious about these breaks, especially in this economy. If as much as $15 billion can be generated - or hell, a couple billion - by retiring some of these handouts it is morally indefensible not to do it. We don't have the funds we need to help the mentally ill and run our justice systems - but we can give all this candy to billionaires? Olympia, do you have a conscience?

 

Most Popular Stories


Now Click This

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy