Top

news

Stories

 

Filthy Rich Still Fighting Over Gates’ Old Fishing Hole

A chapter in the squabble over a Laurelhurst patch of dirt is about to end.

A 20-year-long park-encroachment dispute involving Bill Gates' former bachelor pad in filthy-rich Laurelhurst is about to be resolved by state officials, though not necessarily ended.

The Department of Natural Resources says it is finishing up lease agreements with two landowners that will grant them partial rights to the rectangular state-owned public parkland known as Waterway No. 1, a mostly filled-in historic ferry landing along the Lake Washington waterfront. Yet resident and opponent Kate Lloyd says the new permits will still block access to the public's land and "authorize a large dock that restricts access to Waterway 1 for kayakers and wildlife, and causes pollution problems."

Lloyd, an artist married to a chiropractor, is thought to have undertaken the unauthorized pruning of an overlapping 10-foot hedge bordering the shoreline property of Gates' wealthy sister Libby Armintrout and her husband, Doug, who wrote a letter to the local community club, saying "Kate's [hedge-clip] act was not only extremely offensive, it was criminal"—but took no further action. The Armintrouts own the $3.6 million 43rd Avenue Northeast home where Gates lived until he married and moved up in 1994 to a somewhat nicer home, valued at roughly $115 million, in Medina.

The Laurelhurst pad has been the eye of an unneighborly storm which includes shouting matches between Lloyd and the Armintrouts, the former claims. State DNR Deputy Supervisor Bridget Moran hopes to end the dispute, she says, after a long process that produced two lease agreements to permit use of part of the state property and waterfront, once a canal for the Laurelhurst Launch that ferried locals to and from Madison Park, where they caught the streetcar to downtown. The waterway was partially filled in, and in more recent years residents have kept the lot trimmed and park-like. It consists of a hoops court and a grassy area measuring roughly 35 feet wide and 100 feet deep, banked by rows of hedges.

One lease has already been signed with the Armintrouts, the state says. The other will soon be signed with the neighbors on the other side of the waterway, Robert and Linda Lewis, costing each household about $10,000 annually to encroach onto the greenery and use the waterway for their boats.

To Lloyd, however, that amounts to theft of public property. "Together," she says, "the encroachers have fenced in or blocked more than two-thirds of the park's Lake Washington waterfront. Only 27 feet of the waterway's shoreline remains unencumbered for public use." Noting that the DNR lease process involves the filing of a Determination of Non-Significance, she adds: "How much of a public waterfront park should an adjoining private-property owner be allowed to appropriate before the theft is considered significant?"

But Moran says the deed is done. "In the end, we felt these partial uses will not impede the intent of what that land is for, public use," she says. "We try not to get involved in neighborhood disputes. The intent is to make sure the peoples' land is managed accordingly, and we think we've done that."

 
  • Kin 09/06/2010 12:02:00 AM

    The fate of Waterway 1 is still up in the air. The sixty-six families active in maintaining the waterway have asked Laurelhurst Community Club to place its preservation on the agenda at the LCC monthly meeting on September 13. There is a new historical document covering Laurelhurst history from 1906 to 1950 at www.waterway1.org/uploads/A_History_of_Waterway_1.pdf

  • Kin 08/24/2010 9:10:00 AM

    Whatever happened to this failure of public stewardship? Was the waterfront park leased to well-connected encroachers or is it still public?

  • Amy 11/10/2009 3:33:00 AM

    What happens to a public employee who actually tries to restrict theft of public land by a well-connected person? Perhaps officials believe it is prudent to keep their heads down.

  • Nicholas 11/09/2009 11:00:00 PM

    What another great example of the government representing special interests instead of the taxpayers who pay for their jobs and they are *supposed* to represent. Moran should be fired for giving away public land. What gives him the right to do this?

  • Dorothy 11/08/2009 11:14:00 PM

    Mr. Moran, what are you prepared to do when the partial used fo impete the intent of what the land is used for? Just so you know, you are involved in this neighborhood dispute. I'm not sure how you see giving them this public land lease is "making sure the peoples' land is managed accordingly." What "peoples" are you talking about? You sure can't be talking about the good of the public.

  • Dorothy 11/08/2009 11:04:00 PM

    First off, the title refects nothing about the situation. Why not get to the real issues of the problem. Waterway No. 1 is public land and should remain this way. Bottom line, do the Armintrout's and Lewis's need more land? Who does this benefit? Not the public. Not the environment.

  • Anne 11/07/2009 9:35:00 PM

    I did a web search and found a lot of pictures of what's left of waterway 1 at the web site: http://www.waterway1.org There was also a fascinating essay about the history of the waterway with maps going back to 1908 and memories of people who lived around the waterway in the first half of the Twentieth Century and the 1950s, who built the basketball court, play field, and boat-launching areas.

  • Barb 11/07/2009 6:29:00 AM

    In this instance a photograph would allow the layperson to immediately decide if this is a tempest in a teacup, or yet another rich folks' land grab. With all of the budget constraints these days, we'll be lucky if more chunks of public land or public access don't end up in private hands. I'm glad to at least have access to this article. Sometimes you don't know what you've got 'til it's gone!

  • YouCanWin 11/05/2009 10:54:00 PM

    At least they got rid of the tunnel that children stashed their packs of beer in.

  • angel 11/05/2009 1:43:00 AM

    I live near Waterway 1. We all play basketball there and I help the little kids feed the ducks. It is almost impossible to launch our canoe because there are blackberries growing out of the laurel hedge all across the boat slide. There is a reef of sharp pieces of concrete that extends out from the laurel hedge about 20 feet into the water, which damages our boats if we cross in front of the hedge. Until recently, there was a hollow tunnel going up the center of the huge hedge where kids and other strange people stashed their back packs of beer. The hedge was cut back quite a bit recently, but most of the tunnel is still there. I wish that the state government would remove the big hedge that extends out from one corner to the middle of the waterway. If private owners want to take our public waterfront, they could keep their fence and dog run but remove the huge cherry laurel hedge. They could also remove the reef of rocks and cement.

  • Anne 11/04/2009 11:52:00 PM

    Dear Rick, Thank you for an update on the encroachments at Waterway 1 in Seattle posted on November 4 in the Weekly. Are you able to show a King County map of the park? The extent of encroachment is extraordinary! Alternatively, a viewer can simply view the location at the intersection of 43rd Ave. NE and 35th Street in the King County GIS maps or in Google Earth as I did.�n�n�v47�X 39��10.09��N; 122�X 16��51.30��W) I went to the DNR SEPA site and learned that, on October 8, the Department of Natural Resource issued a SEPA Final Determination of Non-Significance approving a lease for 2,408 square feet (701 sq feet for a blocking dock and boat lift and 1707 for a fenced-in exclusive-use residential area) on the southwest side of the park. According to an application posted October 30, 2009, there is an additional application by Doug Armintrout for a separate lease for exclusive private use of a similar pie-shaped parcel on the northwest side of the park. Judging from the King County GIS map, the proposed Armintrout lease for exclusive use appears to take more than 30 feet of the Lake Washington shoreline and beach front. The map shows that the proposed appropriation will take about 2400 square feet of upland as well as 30-plus feet of shoreline. Thus, the northwest encroachment, alone, appears to take more than 20 percent of the waterway. The two upland encroachments, together take more than one-third of the waterway. (These appropriations are larger than the average family lot in Laurelhurst.) The appropriated shoreline and blocking dock appear to block roughly two-thirds of the shoreline of the waterway. I tend to agree with the view expressed in the article that appropriation of one third of a waterway and two-thirds of the shoreline is not a Non-Significant Appropriation. It is highly significant. This appears to be a precedent-setting decision for all of our public waterfront parks. It must be difficult for public officials when they receive pressure from wealthy and well-connected people to extend privileges to them that would place the privileged above the law. Still, I expect public officials to be stewards of public lands in the face of pressure. When the first Non-Significance determination was posted, 48 neighbors and 3 national foundations (the Center for Environmental Law and Policy, the Seattle Parks Foundation, and the Sierra Club) immediately posted letters expressing outrage. Three cheers for the Seattle Weekly in providing transparency about what is happening under the table.

 

Most Popular Stories


Now Click This

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy