Top

news

Stories

 

Stuff White People Like: Light Rail

Caucasians are flocking to Seattle’s new train.

One morning last week, the #42 bus, which travels on Martin Luther King Way, was, as usual, full of brown and black faces—a strikingly different picture than the sleek new light-rail trains, which run on the same street. During light rail's inaugural week, the trains' passengers were mostly white—pretty surprising given that the trains service the most diverse parts of town.

Buses are still the commute of choice for minorities heading from neighborhood to neighborhood.
Nina Shapiro
Buses are still the commute of choice for minorities heading from neighborhood to neighborhood.
New, white transit riders have embraced the train.
Nina Shapiro
New, white transit riders have embraced the train.

Details

Correction: This story originally incorrectly stated that you cannot transfer for free from light rail to busses. You can do so by showing your light rail ticket or scanning your Orca card on busses. (You must still scan the card as you get on and off light rail. The scanner on the bus you then take will detect that you have already paid.)

Related Content

More About

A ride on the 42 reveals that it's pretty simple why many of its riders are skipping light rail: The bus is simply more convenient, especially for folks who aren't traveling to jobs downtown. Lo Ching, for instance, was on his way to a landscaping job in Ballard. He planned to take the 42 downtown, then transfer to the 15.

For Inja Kim and David Shing—ages 74 and 86, respectively—it's a matter of the distance from their homes to the nearest light-rail station. "It's hard for an old man like me [to walk far]," says Shing, who adds that he lives about a half-mile away from the Othello station.

However, some of the people on the bus had tried the trains and liked them. "They're easy, quick, efficient," says 25-year-old King County employee Chris Frank. Living near the Othello light-rail station, he says he would often take the trains—unless the bus came first, as it had on this day. Other regular riders are obviously passing up the 42 in favor of light rail. The bus had lots of empty seats, stopped less frequently, and arrived downtown five or 10 minutes earlier than usual.

Nationwide, light rail is hardly an all-white phenomenon. In St. Louis, whose Metrolink has been running since the early '90s, minorities account for 52 percent of the ridership, according to a 2008 survey commissioned by the city's transit authority. While that's far less than their share of bus ridership (78 percent), it's roughly consistent with the percentage of minorities in the city's population as a whole (49 percent).

There, what's striking is not that minorities aren't using light rail, but that whites, who rarely travel on buses, are. Al Gonzalez, an engineering-firm president who worked on the 2008 survey, says that cheap parking lots near the stations make it convenient for Caucasians to park and take the trains, particularly to sporting events.

While Seattle's light-rail system lacks park & rides (except in Tukwila), something similar may be going on. On the train one morning, a number of the predominantly white riders were new mass-transit users. John Bernier, who works for the boutique health firm Qliance, lives near the 36 bus line on Beacon Hill, but says he used to drive to work and pay $11 for parking because the bus was too crowded and unpleasant. "I'd rather get to work calm and refreshed," he says, adding that the roomy and air-conditioned train allows him to do just that.

Until recently, RealNetworks software developer Adam Krantz commuted from his Normandy Park home by bus. He says that bus, which traveled on State Route 509, is actually faster—"but the train is more frequent." Another plus: "It's nice and smooth. It's easier to work on with a computer."

Almost every rider had an electronic gadget in hand. Becky Stanley, a volunteer for mayoral candidate Mike McGinn, was using her iPhone to tweet about her ride. She was testing whether it was faster to take the train downtown, after biking from her Seward Park home to the Columbia City station, than it was to bike all the way. The train won. Biking took 50 minutes; she landed at Westlake Center a half-hour after leaving home.

nshapiro@seattleweekly.com

 
  • john 08/13/2009 2:55:00 PM

    AAAAAAAAARGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHH

  • john 08/13/2009 2:41:00 PM

    how long will it take you guys to admit that a normal bus pass will get you on the train? even your corrections to your corrections are wrong. maybe you are behind those idiots trying to block the train from running on I-90!!!

  • Joe 08/11/2009 9:00:00 PM

    Too bad you didn't actually put that in the article...That would have made a little more sense and would be more acceptable than the drivel that was printed... Amateur Hour at the Weekly.

  • Shapiro 08/10/2009 11:37:00 PM

    Jon, demographic information on the city came from one of the researchers who worked on surveys commissioned by Metrolink. I take your point about the white population in the surrounding environs, but as I said in the piece, whites are taking light rail in St. Louis. So are minorities, but they don't dominate the trains as they do the busses. Same thing I've seen here as I've taken the train virtually every day. Yes, there are black and brown faces (as some readers have noted) but nowhere near to the extent as on the busses that travel the same route.

  • Jon Morgan 08/09/2009 11:11:00 AM

    Nina, where are you getting your stats on St. Louis? I lived there and went to school there, I know their Metrolink system and belong to Citizens for Modern Transit, and my parents have lived there for 38 years. St. Louis CITY may be 49% black, but with barely 300,000 people, it's just a tiny fraction of the regional population. St. Charles County-almost all white. South St. Louis County-mostly white. West St. Louis County-mostly white. North St. Louis County-mixed. (The City of St. Louis is independent from St. Louis County, which has over 1 million people) Jefferson County-mostly white. And that's not counting the Illinois side of the river. The St. Louis region, or more importantly the part of it served by light rail, is not remotely 49% black. That fails the laugh test.

  • Lou 08/06/2009 10:04:00 PM

    Please tell me that this article is a failed attempt at satire. I'm not sure exactly what point the author is trying to get across. Is she trying to incite some sort of racial tension, over the purely anecdotal evidence on the ethnic quota of a particular line of public transport? I guess she rode the lightrail for a few days and counted the Caucasians to make those assertions on the ethnicity of the riders? Please tell me that this article is a failed attempt at satire. I'm not sure exactly what point the author is trying to get across. Is she trying to incite some sort of racial tension over the purely anecdotal evidence on ethnic quota of a particular line of public transport? I guess she rode the lightrail for a few days and counted the Caucasians to make those assertions on the ethnicity of the riders? Is she trying to say that the lightrail may be inconvenient for some and just decided to throw in a racial tone to make it more interesting? I've read the article a few times and I'm still unsure if this is actually a serious article, if not... the joke is on me. I couldn't find a single cogent argument in the entire piece and frankly I've seen better writing in college newspapers. Are there seriously no writers out there with ideas can be actually researched and executed with some form of professionalism?Is she trying to say that the lightrail may be inconvenient for some and just decided to throw in a racial tone to make it more interesting? I've read the article a few times and I'm still unsure if this is actually a serious article, if not... the joke is on me. I couldn't find a single cogent argument in the entire piece and frankly I've seen better writing in college newspapers. Are there seriously no writers out there with ideas can be actually researched and executed with some form of professionalism? Any editor worth their salt would not have allowed a piece of race-baiting garbage like this to run.

  • john 08/06/2009 1:35:00 AM

    as an addendum to my last post, i would like to add that i have pictures of my first trip on light rail, and going back through them i see a lot of color. i would love to post them but seattle weekly has no way of doing so. all i can think of is to send the author the photos as an attachment.

  • john 08/05/2009 8:48:00 PM

    what? the author of this article is joking, right? Really, she's not serious is she? I have brown skin- the day I rode the train (the first monday it ran), I heard a lot of languages- and saw a lot of color. I was speaking Spanish with a friend. I heard a bit more of that. Overheard where bits of Arabic, Afar, Chinese, Vietnamese, Tagalog- So- maybe the author doewsn't see very well, or hear well for that matter. o.k. hey, whatever Go ahead and keep alienating yourselves about the people around you. Racism is alive and well in America today. Person opinions aside- As a journalist you must get your facts straight- I was able to go from Seattle to Tukwila and back, using the same ticket I paid $2.50 for to get from Mercer Island to Seattle on Sound Transit's 550 express.

  • R on Beacon Hill 08/02/2009 12:06:00 PM

    The writer's egregious error "One possible railway deterrent: It's not free to transfer from train to bus, as it is from bus to bus" has been pointed out multiple times, here and on most all the local blogs. I remember a time when a Weekly writer would've corrected such an error right away (especially since it can be done so easily on electronic copy), and when the Weekly had actual editors knowledgeable enough to catch such things. But as of midnight Saturday, the error is still right there for all to read. Looks to me like the Weekly's current out-of-town owners are content to run things by remote control. Truth and accuracy are overrated commodities in some quarters, it appears.

  • R on Beacon Hill 08/02/2009 11:58:00 AM

    It's amazing to see writers and critics come up with such profound conclusions about Link light rail during its Second Week of Operation! I can just imagine what similarly enlightened folks were writing two weeks after the first 14 miles of I-5 opened to motorists 45 years ago. I suspect they didn't make very much sense either.

  • Melissa 08/01/2009 9:26:00 AM

    I'm not the first to mention that it is free to transfer from train to bus. I do so every day. I certainly can't be the only person to point out that actual travel times differ significantly from Metro posted times. The #36 regularly takes 30 minutes (actual travel time) from McClellan & Beacon to Westlake. That doesn't count waiting for buses, being passed by full buses, etc. Link takes 15-18 minutes with much shorter waits--and never being passed by. The only possible race-baiting conspiracy anyone could complain about is old news: south end bus service is terrible. The 36, 38, 48 and 60 are slow, irregular, and unreliable. My 4 mile commute takes over 45 minutes by bus. By train, it's 30 minutes plus a short walk. next time, please actually research your article. Ride the train and transfer to a bus. Notice that it is easy and free. Also notice that Link is full of black and brown (and other colors too) faces.

  • Rob 08/01/2009 8:24:00 AM

    Missing URL from above: http://www.soundtransit.org/Riding-Sound-Transit/Fares-and-Passes/Transfers.xml

  • Ren 08/01/2009 2:07:00 AM

    I do not own a car and live by public transit in this city. This article made me think of the similar break between Chicago's El and the Metro- the El is diverse, the Metro (with higher prices, fewer stops, and more reliable) always struck me as very white. As usual, it is more a question of class. My greatest hope for the Link is that people feel more free to move around the city and see how great life on the south side is.

  • Rob 08/01/2009 12:16:00 AM

    Uh.. Fact check, much? See also: Maybe Metro and Sound Transit haven't made the fare info totally clear, but it is easily located by someone willing to make a quick search.

  • cam 07/31/2009 11:16:00 PM

    RE: Transferring from Metro to Sound Transit WRONG: http://metro.kingcounty.gov/tops/bus/fare/fare-regtransfer.html All Link tickets are valid for a one zone bus transfer. Please do the < 1min of research it took to find this out.

 

Most Popular Stories


Now Click This

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy