Top

news

Stories

 

Parents Blame Seattle Scuba for Daughter’s Death

Couple alleges the air wasn’t set correctly in her tank.

Jennifer Coyne had been a certified open-water diver for only two months when she took a trip with Seattle Scuba School to Lummi Rocks near Bellingham. Coyne descended on July 21, 2007. At 10:30 a.m. the Coast Guard was called in, and on July 24 she died.

Last month, Coyne's parents, Kevin Coyne and Julie Simonds, filed suit in King County Superior Court, claiming it was Seattle Scuba's negligence that killed Jennifer. They are seeking unspecified damages. "This is a terrible, horrible, tragic loss that was completely avoidable," says their Bellevue-based attorney, Marc Silverman.

According to the suit, filed May 14, Jennifer Coyne rented her equipment from Seattle Scuba, an affiliate of the Scuba Schools Group, a West Coast chain of diving schools. Coyne took Seattle Scuba's classes at Alki Point to get her certification. Her parents now contend that school owner Craig Gillespie improperly set the regulator that gets air from the tanks, making it too difficult to breathe.

They allege the problem was compounded when Coyne was sent out with another inexperienced diver. The two descended about 60 feet, but Coyne was sluggish. Not long afterward, her partner found her unconscious. When Gillespie succeeded in pulling Coyne up, her stomach was filled with sea water, court records state.

Emergency crews flew Coyne to St. Joseph's Hospital in Tacoma, where she was put on life support. But she never regained consciousness.

Simonds did not respond to attempts to contact her for this story, but she has created a MySpace page devoted to her daughter. Coyne got her certification while her mother and sister, living in Virginia, were pursuing theirs as well, according to the Web site. Simonds still went forward with her own certification, calling it bittersweet.

Gillespie declined to comment for this story, but according to a court database, this is the first time Seattle Scuba has been sued in King County.

 
  • 12/06/2011 10:46:00 PM

    As someone who has experienced a near-fatal equipment malfunction with rented equipment (faulty BCD hose) I can sympathize with the family and Missyc1. The truth is that even when equipment is checked by the diver it can still malfunction in the water due to improper maintenance and inexperienced divers might not know how to recover. PADI training doesn't cover everything. Has there been any resolution to this case? Was the case won/lost/settled? I've googled and can't find anything. I would have at least expected some statement from Seattle Scuba expressing regret and their side.

  • Missyc1 07/15/2011 4:21:00 AM

    THE DIVE SHOP WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WORKING CONDITION OF THE REGULATOR AND THEY KNEW HER LACK OF EXPERIENCE. I would never wrongfully accuse anyone but come on.... she checked her equipment the best THEY showed her to and then dived.... not to mention the dive shop NEVER EVEN CALLED HER FAMILY AFTER SHE HAD DIED TO OFFER THEM ANY EXPLANTION OR EVEN AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT SHE HAD PASSED AWAY under their care....rather turned their back as if nothing happened.... that says alot for their level of compassion and I certainly wouldn't want to have anything at any time to do with this dive group and thier affiliates anytime- anywhere.... God help you all find better working practices for your business or get out!

  • Missyc1 07/15/2011 4:13:00 AM

    Its not about suing for the MONEY!! It's about holding someone accountable for what they could have prevented in hopes this wont happen to anyone else!! They didn't sue to gain any money... they sued because that is the only way to get their attention so they will hopefully change their neglegent ways of operating their business and understand the importance of maintenance on their equipment. Especially in this business.

  • Missyc1 07/15/2011 4:08:00 AM

    Thier is no law suit crap- its about making her horrible accident make a difference for the next young diver. I suggest you DO NOT comment as you have when you obviously don't know the whole story and be grateful to no end it was not YOUR daughter, WIFE, or MOTHER- Jennifer was a beautiful, smart, ambitious young woman who obviously ended up in the WRONG HANDS!!! They are to FAULT as thier equipment was not inspected/checked regularly and therefore cost Jennifer her life and has hurt beyond words all of her friends and family more than words can say and deprived Jenn of a lifetime of wonderful and SAFE adventures.

  • CScott 01/23/2011 6:11:00 PM

    As , and this is the key point, a CERTIFIED DIVER, equipment has got to be the divers responsiblity to check for proper function before any diving. That is taught to ALL padi divers. Young divers (meaning low dives logged) are and should be usually redundant about gear checks. What is being said about her dive buddy? Does the dive buddy not help in pre-dive checks anymore? This sport has inheren't risk and all divers assume that risk. Sorry for your loss but really, get off the lawsuit crap. As a PADI CERTIFIED DIVER, this young lady didn't just get handed her card, she had to do the work. That's why PADI has such high training standards, to keep ALL divers safe from the first pool session to open water check out. If there is something you don't understand, it is gone over until you do, and when you pass the tests and diving checkouts per PADI standards, YOU then assume the risk of diving. And that is where an instructor's liability ends, until a basic certified diver wishes to deepen their knowledge in advanced courses under the wing of an instructor. Makes not an ioda of difference weither a diver has been certified for two months or twenty years, both have been taught the same.

  • Kalena 12/03/2009 11:18:00 PM

    Unfortunately this is a simple case of not pre-checking their equipment before going down. Which means that the instructor will probably take the blame for this case. What I really don't get is how suing someone for money will really help a family with the loss of their daughter. I'm sure the instructor feels horrible as is, but money won't bring her back and destroying other's lives along the way is rediculous.

  • DAVE 06/20/2009 5:59:00 AM

    ANY DIVER NOWS TO CHECK THERE EQUIPMENT BEFORE THE DIVE IF SO SHE WOULD HAVE FOUND THE FLOR

  • Cam 06/18/2009 9:48:00 AM

    This is an interesting case and could have repurcussions for all instructors depending on the outcome and what exactly they find him negligent of. If they say it was the training, it shows just how vulnerable instructors are to lawsuits. You follow the standards set forth by a regulatory group (like PADI), and you creat a qualified diver that should in theory be able to dive with a buddy in suitable conditions. The instructor's liability should end there. If they say it is the regulator, this will open up a can of worms for dive shops and manufacturers because that would mean you could be liable for any equipment malfunction.

 

Most Popular Stories


Now Click This

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy