Top

news

Stories

 

The Secret to Passing a Payday-Loan Reform Bill

Make sure everyone hates it.

Payday lenders would be required to establish a statewide database to track all borrowers: their incomes, how many loans they have 
outstanding.
Payday lenders would be required to establish a statewide database to track all borrowers: their incomes, how many loans they have outstanding.

Every year, bills pop up in Olympia to rein in the payday-loan industry. Rep. Sherry Appleton (D-Kitsap) has made an annual tradition of introducing a bill that would limit the interest rate these lenders can charge, capping it at 36 percent (down from fees equal to about 391 percent today). Not surprisingly, these attempts are vehemently opposed by the industry and often die in committee—as Appleton's did again this year—leaving everything pretty much status quo.

But Rep. Sharon Nelson (D-Maury Island) has introduced a comprehensive industry reform bill this session that both sides in the payday-loan wars hate—so the thing actually has a shot at getting passed and signed.

Nelson has a particular interest in the subject. Before being appointed to the legislature to replace Joe McDermott, who jumped to the state Senate in 2007, she created loan packages for Bank of America. Her bill, she says, "recognizes that for some folks, [payday lending] works, and it also recognizes that for other folks it does not work and we need to establish a program to help them get out of debt." Interest-rate caps, when passed in other states, have resulted in the industry simply picking up stakes and leaving.

Nelson says she heard from leaders of various Latino organizations that payday lenders provide much-needed services. Ligia Velasquez, one of the planners of Hispanic Legislative Day and a board member at the Statewide Poverty Action Network, says the cheap check-cashing and wire transfers offered by payday lenders are valuable to many Latinos. (Still, Velasquez would like to see Appleton's interest-rate cap placed on the industry.) Cristobal Guillen, president of the Association of Washington State Hispanic Chambers of Commerce, testified at a Feb. 10 House hearing on Nelson's bill that payday lenders are some people's only source of credit. Guillen did not return phone messages left earlier this week, but his association's largest sponsor is Moneytree, the largest local check-cashing and payday-lending operation. Nelson says her bill is intended to walk a fine line between keeping the businesses open and protecting borrowers.

Nelson's bill has four main parts. First, it would limit to eight the number of loans a person can take out during any calendar year. Second, it would set a maximum amount that customers could borrow at any one time: 30 percent of their monthly income or $700. Third, payday lenders would be required to offer a payment-plan option without additional fees to borrowers, giving them up to 90 days to pay debts up to $400, and 180 days for anything larger. Currently, the law requires the installment-plan option after four loans. Borrowers also wouldn't be able to take out another loan while on an installment plan. Finally, payday lenders would be required to establish a statewide database to track all borrowers: their incomes, how many loans they have outstanding, and whether any are on installment plans.

Lenders hate the bill, even if it leaves interest rates alone. Dennis Bassford, CEO of Renton-based Moneytree, wonders why banks and retailers shouldn't have to maintain a similar statewide database for credit-card holders, who've also been known to get in pretty far over their heads.

"The question that I always ask rhetorically is 'What are the other products that should also be tracked?'," Bassford says.

More disconcerting for Bassford is the number of different sections in the bill, most of which haven't been tried out in other states. "It creates an uncertainty for the future," he says. Four Moneytree stores in Washington have leases up this year, and Bassford says that if the legislation passes, it might not make sense to extend the leases for another five years.

Other industry representatives claim the bill will drive smaller operations out of business. At a hearing on Monday before the Senate Committee on Labor, Commerce and Consumer Protection, where Nelson's bill is now being heard after passing the House on March 9, Kenneth Weaver, a Chehalis man with two payday-lending stores in central Washington, said his business might not be able to survive the new rules. He asked the legislators to consider letting capitalism work out interest rates and repayment plans. He said other stores in his area that have been more ruthless with customers have been forced out by operations like his that are willing to work with people having trouble paying back the small loans.

Hating the bill from the other direction is Appleton, one of 10 House representatives who voted against the measure. She thinks eight loans a year is too many. She also wanted a mandatory 30-day gap between loans, as well as the interest-rate cap. Appleton says she'll keep pursuing these tighter controls in future sessions.

But other industry opponents are grudgingly supporting the bill in the Senate, including the Washington Community Action Network and even King County Councilmember Larry Gossett. A Gossett representative read a letter to the committee on Monday offering support for the bill, but also calling for more stringent amendments. The committee is expected to vote on the bill next Monday.

lonstot@seattleweekly.com

 
  • Jon Schultz 03/31/2009 12:18:00 AM

    Excellent comments by Allan Johnson and James. People who evaluate payday loans in terms of an annual percentage rate are distorting the issue. The APR, as a statistical tool, only has value for comparing loans which you have access to. If all other factors are the same, you should choose the one with the lowest APR. But if due to your lack of credit you can't borrow at credit card rates, that doesn't mean a payday loan is a bad option for you, it all depends on your circumstances. And payday lenders have to charge a triple-digit *annual* interest rate just to break even on the transaction, because they are only collecting interest for a short period of time, not a year. It is nothing but a big myth that a line can be drawn between a reasonable APR on a loan and an excessive one. To say that a payday loan's 400% APR is excessive because you can get a home loan at 7% is as valid as saying that a share of Google stock at $320 is excessive because you can get a share of Sirius stock for thirty-two cents. There are other factors that need to be taken into consideration which the critics of payday lending simply try to ignore, thinking they can fool people into supporting a ban of the product by harping on the relatively high APR. Unfortunately they have succeeded with that in several states and are trying to do so on a federal level as well. Yes, some people get themselves into a bind by their own irresponsible use of payday loans, but many more people get themselves into a far more serious obesity bind through their own irresponsible use of food. Does that mean we should place a cap on the percentage of fat and sugar allowed in ice cream and other foods? Most of the consumer activists gunning for a ban on payday loans would not be so hot for that, because they use those foods and want the freedom to decide for themselves whether or not to do so. They should allow the same freedom to payday loan customers, who according to all customer satisfaction surveys consider the loans to be a useful financial option and do not want them effectively banned by interest rate caps which would require the lenders to offer the loans for less than the cost of issuing them - all so "consumer activists" and politicians can brag about what a great job they are doing protecting us from scandalous greed. Preserve freedom in America, please.

  • JeffKursman 03/26/2009 7:42:00 PM

    Reputable payday lenders want customers to use payday advances wisely. The service's goal is to be a solution for those who need low-dollar, short-term credit. A payday loan may not be the best choice in every situation.

  • James 03/26/2009 5:00:00 AM

    Every time this comes up I roll my eyes. Once again people feel the need to hold someone's hand and make sure they don't hurt themselves. I have used payday loans in the past, and I got pretty over my head with them, too..but you know what? I did what I needed to do to get out of my hole because I accepted personal responsibility for my actions, and my signature. When they present the paperwork to you, the interest rate is in big, bold numbers and it very clearly states that they will deposit your check on your pay day. How hard is it to ask some people to take personal responsibility for their actions? If someone signed the dotted line and can't pay up, that's their own problem! They will become a profit vehicle for the collections agencies, the banks with their overdraft/NSF fees, the calculated risk that the lender took, etc. Yes, these deadbeats are stimulating the economy, so leave them alone. The reason why the interest rates and fees are so high is because of the insane amount of risk involved by extending credit to people who are obviously broke. If they weren't broke or didn't manage their finances appropriately, they wouldn't need a payday loan, right? I know there are 'surprises' and 'extenuating circumstances' and whatever you need to tell yourself to justify borrowing money from these places..like I said, I have used them and relied on them in the past. For many people, this is a last-resort to borrowing from less-than-legal sources, so let the businesses make a buck off of their backs. The sponsor needs to come down from her ivory tower of high credit scores and middle-class income realize that for many people, they can't simply 'fix' their finances overnight, nor can they simply ask for a 'real' loan from their bank or credit card. They need money to eat for the week or pay the rent. Don't get me started on the privacy aspects of this bill. Yeesh!

  • allan johnson 03/26/2009 4:30:00 AM

    I can't believe someone thinks they have to "count" my payday loans. Anyone who has a check account surely is capable of getting a two week loan without some type of Credit nanny watching them. I have use payday loans before....and i did just fine thank you. I think I stand at blockbuster looking for legislators who rent more than one movie...spank their hand and say silly boy, the nanny sez just one. Your way to stupid to rent more than one because you are the stupid people passing this legislation to socialize my credit options.

 

Most Popular Stories


Now Click This

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy