Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Most Popular

National Features >

  • Village Voice

    The Great Walls of Chinatown

    With the exception of the electric rice cookers, this Bowery tenement could have come straight from the Nineteenth Century.

    By Elizabeth Dwoskin

  • Houston Press

    Getting Off

    DUI attorney Tyler Flood wins 80 percent of his trials--even if his clients were 100 percent drunk.

    By Mike Giglio

  • Miami New Times

    Park or Die Tryin'

    From the homeless parking mafia to the meter fairy, finding a spot in Miami has taken a turn toward the surreal.

    By Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • City Pages

    The Baddest Men on the Planet

    Straight from the Sam's Club tire shop, Brett Rogers prepares to meet Fedor Emelianenko in mortal combat.

    By Bradley Campbell

Land Rover and Friends vs. Seattle

We want our $700,000 back.

By Laura Onstot

Published on December 23, 2008 at 9:35pm

Three foreign car companies, Honda, Jaguar/Land Rover, and Volvo, have joined forces to sue the City of Seattle, hoping to recoup more than $700,000 they recently paid in business and occupation taxes. City assessments showed the automakers owed money going back to January 2003 on imported cars sold in Seattle—taxes the car companies have hired Perkins Coie to argue are unconstitutional.

Attorney Robert Mahon says the way you fight allegedly unfair city taxes is to pay them, then try to get your money back in court. So on Dec. 15, all three companies had checks hand-delivered to the city. That same day, Mahon filed suit in King County District Court to get the money back.

Mahon says applying the B&O tax to businesses that send cars into the United States for sale at a domestic dealership violates a constitutional exception from sales tax for imports and exports. A similar business sales tax rule in California was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in the '50s for exactly that reason, he says. "It's a little bit old," Mahon says of that judgment. "But it hasn't been overruled."

City spokeswoman Katherine Schubert-Knapp declined to comment on the specifics of the case, but according to the suit, the city claimed in earlier discussions that the tax applied because the automakers actually delivered their cars to the dealerships, as opposed to the dealerships importing the cars themselves.