Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Most Popular

National Features >

  • City Pages

    Michele Bachmann, Unmuzzled

    You don't need to read Sarah Palin's book to hear the ravings of a mad woman.

    By Matt Snyders

  • Miami New Times

    Pimp Daddy

    The rise and fall of a chubby sex-cult leader.

    By Natalie O'Neill

  • Riverfront Times

    Babe 'n' Arms

    Tom was a hot-tempered cross-dresser with a garage full of guns--and then he became Rachel.

    By Nicholas Phillips

  • Dallas Observer

    The Fight for Texas

    Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison are locked in a battle over the soul of the GOP. They're also running for governor.

    By Sam Merten

Land Rover and Friends vs. Seattle

We want our $700,000 back.

By Laura Onstot

Published on December 23, 2008 at 9:35pm

Three foreign car companies, Honda, Jaguar/Land Rover, and Volvo, have joined forces to sue the City of Seattle, hoping to recoup more than $700,000 they recently paid in business and occupation taxes. City assessments showed the automakers owed money going back to January 2003 on imported cars sold in Seattle—taxes the car companies have hired Perkins Coie to argue are unconstitutional.

Attorney Robert Mahon says the way you fight allegedly unfair city taxes is to pay them, then try to get your money back in court. So on Dec. 15, all three companies had checks hand-delivered to the city. That same day, Mahon filed suit in King County District Court to get the money back.

Mahon says applying the B&O tax to businesses that send cars into the United States for sale at a domestic dealership violates a constitutional exception from sales tax for imports and exports. A similar business sales tax rule in California was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in the '50s for exactly that reason, he says. "It's a little bit old," Mahon says of that judgment. "But it hasn't been overruled."

City spokeswoman Katherine Schubert-Knapp declined to comment on the specifics of the case, but according to the suit, the city claimed in earlier discussions that the tax applied because the automakers actually delivered their cars to the dealerships, as opposed to the dealerships importing the cars themselves.