Top

news

Stories

 

1,000 Years in Jail's Not Enough

As King County faces a budget crisis, prosecutors spend big money piling on a convicted rapist.

Mark Wayne Rathbun is a terrifying individual. Known as the "Belmont Shore Rapist," he was described as "a monster" by the California judge who in 2004 sentenced him to 1,030 years, plus 10 consecutive life sentences, on 59 counts of rape.

You might think that was enough. But to King County prosecutors, it wasn't.

Despite a budget crisis that has county justice officials complaining about cuts to public safety, King County prosecutor Dan Satterberg recently put Rathbun on trial again, after DNA samples tied Rathbun to three rapes that occurred in Ballard in 1996 (a year before the California spree began). The three-week trial concluded October 13 with three convictions for first-degree burglary and three more for first-degree rape. Now awaiting sentencing, Rathbun continues to be housed in the King County Jail, where the average cost per inmate is $98 per day (according to a 2006 study by the King County Council), meaning the county has spent roughly $48,000 incarcerating someone who would otherwise have been imprisoned on California's dime.

Rathbun's attorney, public defender Micheline Murphy of the Northwest Defenders Association, sees the prosecution as a waste of scarce resources. On the defense side alone, she notes, a DNA expert cost $22,345, and $777 was spent on photocopies. Northwest Defenders, which is funded by the county, devoted 270 attorney hours to Rathbun's case before the trial even started. All told, the case could cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars. Meanwhile, a projected $93 million county budget shortfall means that many crimes are not being investigated or are being automatically pled down to lesser offenses.

"As a taxpayer, I felt that this was a case of throwing good money after bad," Murphy said in an e-mail. "Regardless of anything that could have happened to Mr. Rathbun while in King County, he will still be imprisoned for the remainder of his life." The California Supreme Court already refused to hear Rathbun's appeal in October 2007, though he could still appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court or attempt what is known as a collateral attack, introducing new evidence or claiming his lawyer was incompetent. Success with these tactics is exceedingly rare, but could result in resentencing or a new trial.

King County's Chief Criminal Deputy Prosecutor, Mark Larson, argues that the nature of Rathbun's crimes required prosecution, noting that the office frequently declines to pursue lesser charges against defendants incarcerated elsewhere. "But short of homicide," he says, "the crimes [Rathbun] committed were the worst you could commit."

Larson also cites the importance of the trial for the victims, who found the experience cathartic. And he adds that extra insurance against Rathbun's release never hurts. "Metaphorically speaking, [the convictions] are like belts and suspenders. You can always use another belt, another pair of suspenders. These guys are like mass murderers—our job is to do everything we can to keep them incarcerated."

 
  • ndpc 11/14/2008 8:38:00 PM

    i think it is a waste of tax payer money to further prosecute this guy. he is a monster and he should not be let out of a jail for a long time (if ever). however, the guy was convicted of, what, 59 counts of rape and about 1,000 years. clearly he is not going to get out (and, really, what is the likelihood that he is going to win 59 appeals. not good.) i just think it is too bad that some people have this idea that when you have cases like this (i.e. ones where the individual will never see the light of day) that you should continue to prosecute--it really has minimal positive effect on the entire community. (granted it may be cathartic to victims of the crimes.) perhaps the money would be better spent on preventative programs, so these things wont happen again. Or put the money to police training, so the cops are better equipped to catch these guys (one comment said that the cops mishandled a rape case). i think we need to be tough on crime, but at a certain point you are just going for 'overkill' and wasting valuable money and resources.

  • la femme nikita 11/14/2008 11:09:00 AM

    I am a King County resident and a large portion of my income goes to property taxes. At one time, I was also the owner of a pair of panties that provided some of the DNA evidence used to convict Mark Wayne Rathbun of the three rapes he was recently convicted of. Perhaps it would have saved the county a couple of thousand dollars to just ignore his crimes in Ballard. However, at the time the decision was made to prosecute, his California conviction was under appeal. My case remained unsolved for ten years. I was told by the police at the time of the rape that the rapist had very likely been stalking me. As a result, I essentially cut all traceable ties to the community that had been my home for twenty years and "went to ground". A police spokeswoman at a community meeting admitted publicly that my case had been bungled by the original police officers who had responded. A more ambitious person could have pursued a lawsuit against the city, but my major concern was that the rapist be stopped. During my rape, Rathbun attempted to smother me -perhaps if he had been successful with me or one of their loved ones the Weekly's "Cutting Room" team would be more willing to prosecute. Contrary to King County Prosecutor Dan Satterburg's remarks that the victims experienced catharsis from the trial, I testified (and would testify again) only to ensure that this serial rapist would never again be free to harm any of my sisters. Public defender Micheline Murphy bemoans the cost of the defense she mounted on Rathbun's defense when it was Rathbun's decision (as is his right) to go to trial in spite of overwhelming evidence. Nonetheless, the vigor of the defense should serve to undermine any future appeals, saving the cost of retrial. Our legal system originally based its concept of rape as one impassioned man forcing himself on another man's property. Science now tells us that there are individuals who are "wired" to victimize and society can never allow them to roam freely. Until a better system arises, seemingly redundant prosecutions and sentencings are society's only means of protecting itself. Anonymous for obvious reasons

  • Just the Truth 11/14/2008 10:59:00 AM

    One question and one question only Damon and please have the guts to answer it. If your mother, sister, daughter was the victim, the woman whose house was broken into in the middle of the night and violently raped at knife point, violated again and again.....would you want the perpetrator prosecuted?

  • Anne 11/13/2008 8:44:00 PM

    The appeal process of Kevin Coe serial rapes should be enough evidence that we need to convict on each and every crime that can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. I am pleased that this criminal will have a record in Washington State as well as in California. I only wish that he was eligible for the death penalty.

 

Most Popular Stories


Now Click This

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy