Top

news

Stories

 

Simply (Not) the Best

Don't believe the decal.

For 11 years, a Colorado-based company called In the Spotlight has helped other businesses display positive reviews from online guides like Citysearch and AOL's City Guide. Restaurants, bars, and shops can purchase any number of materials, from window decals to plaques to banners, trumpeting various plaudits. In the Spotlight makes their money, the business gets to call attention to its good buzz, and everyone goes home happy.

At least that was the impression AOL spokesperson Jaymelina Esmele got when looking over In the Spotlight's Web site. "At first glance, it seems no different than a restaurant cutting out and framing a positive review from The Seattle Times or any other local newspaper," she says.

But there's a catch: In the Spotlight's products give the impression that they were given out by the organizations whose reviews they publish, when in fact those organizations may be either unaware or even resentful of their content being used without permission.

"In the Spotlight is not affiliated with Citysearch in any way, and they are not authorized to use our name or sell our awards," says Citysearch spokesperson Nicole Myden.

For example, at downtown's Mae Phim restaurant on Pike Street, the windows are crowded with In the Spotlight–issued materials declaring the restaurant to be "Best of Citysearch." There's even a giant banner on the side of the building saying the same thing. But Mae Phim didn't win Best of Citysearch in the years claimed (2006 and 2007) or in either of the categories mentioned (Thai food and "cheap eats").

In addition, In the Spotlight materials quote from the Web sites, but do not differentiate between quotes that come from critics employed by the sites and comments from anonymous readers. They're all simply "reviews."

The three major organizations whose reviews In the Spotlight displays are Citysearch, AOL City Guide, and Zagat Survey—the latter being the only one of the three that actually has a formal partnership with In the Spotlight (and which did not return repeat inquiries seeking comment for this story). Zagat, of course, only publishes reader reviews.

Citysearch's Myden declined to comment on what legal action, if any, Citysearch might take against In the Spotlight, but copyright and trademark attorney Bill Ferron of Seattle-based intellectual property firm Seed IP says they could make a reasonable case for trademark infringement if they so chose.

Should they decide to pursue such a path, it would certainly surprise Michael Stern, In the Spotlight's owner and founder. "It's true that we're not authorized by them, but I haven't gotten the impression they really object," he says. "I don't think we really pose a threat to them—all we're really doing is promoting their Web sites."

Stern also claims the large size of companies like Citysearch and AOL often means that communications from his much smaller company, including attempts to negotiate partnerships, go unnoticed or even ignored.

Until recently, AOL's Esmele was unaware In the Spotlight even existed. Like Citysearch, AOL's City Guide has official decals they send to winners of their City's Best contest. They also provide a free downloadable logo that nominees can use to make up their own materials.

"Only an actual winner can say they're a winner," explains Esmele. "We have a policy about that, but I'm not sure what we do in cases like these. I wasn't aware [of In the Spotlight], so we definitely don't have any agreement with them."

This comes as a surprise to Pam Connors, a first-time visitor to Seattle who made the decision to dine at Divine, a Greek restaurant in Maple Leaf, after noticing an In the Spotlight decal in their window declaring it one of Citysearch's best. Connors says she has noticed similar products in several cities she has visited, and based her dining decisions on them more than once.

"I didn't even realize that Citysearch didn't give them that sticker," she says. "I thought it was something they got as a prize or something."

news@seattleweekly.com

 
  • Nicole Myden 08/28/2008 9:10:00 PM

    Each year, Citysearch does in fact distribute branded decal stickers (free of charge) to merchants who are actual category winners in our "Best of Citysearch" campaign who are worthy of the accolades. The stickers that say "In The Spotlight" on them are not authorized by or connected with Citysearch, and have in the past been provided to merchants who may or may not have been actual category winners of the "Best of Citysearch" awards. Nicole Myden Public Relations Manager, Citysearch.com

  • Maverick 08/25/2008 9:19:00 PM

    Dear Ms. Lisa Lorenzana, I'd like to say something in regards to the statement that you made here: Finally, I�d like to say that the real disservice you and Ms. Breysse do is not only to Mae Phim�s and Divine�s restaurants, but to many small business owners who rely on these types of displays to attract interest in their business and promote their community reputations. By calling us into question, you question the validity of these restaurants� achievements. You and Ms Breysse claim that �Mae Phim didn�t win Best of Citysearch�in either of the categories mentioned.� This information is public and easy to find, so I wonder where either you obtained your information before committing it to both print and the television. You need only view the content of the following link to take my point: http://seattle.citysearch.com/bestof/winners/2006/thai_food. I believe completely that the disservice that has been done here is by your company "Searchlight" as you are CLEARLY misleading these mom and pop restaurants into believing that they've received something to which they have not! I looked at the link provided they were number 5 on the list, that's not winning that's like being nominated. By placing the call to Mae Phim telling them that they won this you are misleading this restaurant and you are later misleading their customer base by telling them that they won. It CLEARLY shows that: Chantanee Family Thai Restaurant won the award. What your company does is leeches off the work of other companies and passes it off as their own by lying to the businesses that you pander to. That's not respectful, that's tarnished and like selling snake oil. And for the last comment: Wow you're really out of things to write huh? There are so many interesting important stories out there and then here you go targeting a company that sounds harmless to me. It's pretty pathetic. Comment by Katie Tom from Seattle on Aug 22nd, 2008, 14:20 pm I'm going to take a wild guess that you work for Searchlight and I personally think that discredible, lying and manipulating businesses are indeed newsworthy and I myself am thankful for the story.

  • Katie Tom 08/23/2008 12:20:00 AM

    Wow you're really out of things to write huh? There are so many interesting important stories out there and then here you go targeting a company that sounds harmless to me. It's pretty pathetic.

  • Lisa Lorenzana 08/22/2008 2:50:00 AM

    We at InTheSpotlight.com would like to take the opportunity to respond to your story, �The cost of being one of the city�s best,� that was aired on KOMONEWS 4 in Seattle on the evening of 8.20.08 and posted on the KOMONEWS.COM website on 8.21.08. It was unfortunate to have missed the call you placed to us after business hours on 8.20.08, as we would have been happy to respond to any inquiries, as we have with staff writer, Emma Breysse, at your affiliate company, Seattle Weekly. Had we had that opportunity to respond before the segment aired, we would have been able to clear up some of the inaccuracies that you reported. The first thing I�d like to clear up is the implication that we somehow �download content� from any of these websites in order to duplicate branding on our graphics. In your segment, you show a variety of our plaques that clearly show no confusion of brands. I would encourage you, your viewers, and your readers to visit all the websites, including our own, to confirm this. You may do this at: www.inthespotlight.com, www.citysearch.com, and www.cityguide.aol.com Many, if not all, of the decals shown in your segment actually came directly from the publications, and not InTheSpotlight, which may explain why the resemblance to their branding seemed so overwhelming. Ms. Breyssee, in her attendant article in the Seattle Weekly, �Simply (Not) the Best,� also makes several false statements. First, she states that we �do not differentiate between quotes that come from critics employed by the sites and comments from anonymous readers.� All reviews that appear on these graphics come solely from user comments�content that is not owned by these publications. As we state in �Our Mission� on our website, part of the service we provide is in supporting The New Word of Mouth as voiced by the people who frequent local businesses. That we offer these business owners ways to display not only favorable consumer reviews, but also their recent awards and accolades in their industries, is providing for them an opportunity to participate in their company�s reputation, as well as to promote it. And, yes, Ms. Breysse, like most, we are a for profit company and have never claimed otherwise. The information we provide is free. Our products, however, do come with a price. Finally, I�d like to say that the real disservice you and Ms. Breysse do is not only to Mae Phim�s and Divine�s restaurants, but to many small business owners who rely on these types of displays to attract interest in their business and promote their community reputations. By calling us into question, you question the validity of these restaurants� achievements. You and Ms Breysse claim that �Mae Phim didn�t win Best of Citysearch�in either of the categories mentioned.� This information is public and easy to find, so I wonder where either you obtained your information before committing it to both print and the television. You need only view the content of the following link to take my point: http://seattle.citysearch.com/bestof/winners/2006/thai_food. Ms Breysse prints the following in her article: ��Pam Connors, a first-time visitor to Seattle who made the decision to dine at Divine, a Greek restaurant in Maple Leaf, after noticing an In the Spotlight decal in their window declaring it one of Citysearch's best. Connors says she has noticed similar products in several cities she has visited, and based her dining decisions on them more than once.� These products are designed for exactly this type of situation, which benefits both the consumer and the business. Ms. Breysse�s article calls into question whether Ms. Connors made a valid dining decision, or whether she was the victim of an advertising scam. In short, it calls into question whether Divine is in fact worth it or not. I encourage you and your readers to visit Divine�s Citysearch Top 10 page (http://seattle.citysearch.com/bestof/winners/2007/mediterranean_food) as well as their recent feature as a Zagat Survey Noteworthy Newcomer. Divine�s intention to display these achievements was a great business decision and exhibits an owner�s pride in their recent success. One in which your segment and Ms. Breysse�s attendant article has served to call into question. Michael Stern or I would be happy to answer any further questions you may have about our relationship with Citysearch or AOL, our partnership with the Zagat Survey (which you failed to mention in your segment), our company, or our products. Sincerely, Lisa Lorenzana Director of Operations InTheSpotlight.com 1-888-272-8782

  • Lisa Lorenzana 08/22/2008 1:20:00 AM

    8.21.08 Dear Luke Deucy, We at InTheSpotlight.com would like to take the opportunity to respond to your story, �The cost of being one of the city�s best,� that was aired on KOMONEWS 4 in Seattle on the evening of 8.20.08 and posted on the KOMONEWS.COM website on 8.21.08. It was unfortunate to have missed the call you placed to us after business hours on 8.20.08, as we would have been happy to respond to any inquiries, as we have with staff writer, Emma Breysse, at your affiliate company, Seattle Weekly. Had we had that opportunity to respond before the segment aired, we would have been able to clear up some of the inaccuracies that you reported. The first thing I�d like to clear up is the implication that we somehow �download content� from any of these websites in order to duplicate branding on our graphics. In your segment, you show a variety of our plaques that clearly show no confusion of brands. I would encourage you, your viewers, and your readers to visit all the websites, including our own, to confirm this. You may do this at: www.inthespotlight.com, www.citysearch.com, and www.cityguide.aol.com Many, if not all, of the decals shown in your segment actually came directly from the publications, and not InTheSpotlight, which may explain why the resemblance to their branding seemed so overwhelming. Ms. Breyssee, in her attendant article in the Seattle Weekly, �Simply (Not) the Best,� also makes several false statements. First, she states that we �do not differentiate between quotes that come from critics employed by the sites and comments from anonymous readers.� All reviews that appear on these graphics come solely from user comments�content that is not owned by these publications. As we state in �Our Mission� on our website, part of the service we provide is in supporting The New Word of Mouth as voiced by the people who frequent local businesses. That we offer these business owners ways to display not only favorable consumer reviews, but also their recent awards and accolades in their industries, is providing for them an opportunity to participate in their company�s reputation, as well as to promote it. And, yes, Ms. Breysse, like most, we are a for profit company and have never claimed otherwise. The information we provide is free. Our products, however, do come with a price. Finally, I�d like to say that the real disservice you and Ms. Breysse do is not only to Mae Phim�s and Divine�s restaurants, but to many small business owners who rely on these types of displays to attract interest in their business and promote their community reputations. By calling us into question, you question the validity of these restaurants� achievements. You and Ms Breysse claim that �Mae Phim didn�t win Best of Citysearch�in either of the categories mentioned.� This information is public and easy to find, so I wonder where either you obtained your information before committing it to both print and the television. You need only view the content of the following link to take my point: http://seattle.citysearch.com/bestof/winners/2006/thai_food. Ms Breysse prints the following in her article: ��Pam Connors, a first-time visitor to Seattle who made the decision to dine at Divine, a Greek restaurant in Maple Leaf, after noticing an In the Spotlight decal in their window declaring it one of Citysearch's best. Connors says she has noticed similar products in several cities she has visited, and based her dining decisions on them more than once.� These products are designed for exactly this type of situation, which benefits both the consumer and the business. Ms. Breysse�s article calls into question whether Ms. Connors made a valid dining decision, or whether she was the victim of an advertising scam. In short, it calls into question whether Divine is in fact worth it or not. I encourage you and your readers to visit Divine�s Citysearch Top 10 page (http://seattle.citysearch.com/bestof/winners/2007/mediterranean_food) as well as their recent feature as a Zagat Survey Noteworthy Newcomer. Divine�s intention to display these achievements was a great business decision and exhibits an owner�s pride in their recent success. One in which your segment and Ms. Breysse�s attendant article has served to call into question. Michael Stern or I would be happy to answer any further questions you may have about our relationship with Citysearch or AOL, our partnership with the Zagat Survey (which you failed to mention in your segment), our company, or our products. Sincerely, Lisa Lorenzana Director of Operations InTheSpotlight.com 1-888-272-8782

  • Kurt 08/21/2008 9:14:00 PM

    I saw this on TV and they had someone who owned a business that bought one of these stickers. She said that she had no idea that they weren't rated as tops! As an owner of the coffee shop/bar that was voted second best coffee in town last year, the FIRST thing you do when you are told that you are tops is go on line to look at the reviews. We got two "top picks" this year, one from Seattle Metropolitan magazine and another from the Lonely Planet. Both sent us stickers... kurt from Cafe Racer

  • MaePhim 08/21/2008 8:44:00 PM

    After previously being employed by this company, I've come to a realization that there is definitely some wool being pulled over restaurants owners eyes. We were instructed that anyone in the Top 10 was a "Winner" and that anyone who had at least 3 stars was "Top Rated" It didn't matter if the Restaurant had one review from 2004, or no reviews at all, or even 80 reviews from yesterday, it was all fair game. Most of the graphics portray the whole, Winner, Top 10, or Top Rated thing, but the review comments are constantly manipulated and cut up to build the best review possible from the words left on the site. Bottom line...just don't trust the decals on the windows.

  • Baby Jane 08/20/2008 10:06:00 PM

    I'd be interested in knowing if the company contacts businesses saying that they won these awards first and foremost? If so it isn't the restaurant's fault for wanting to be noticed for what they view as achievements in the community. It's wrong to take advantage of mom and pop restaurants who typically don't have the budget to spend on lavish things. It also hurts to the restaurants reputation to showcase awards they didn't win.

  • Seely 08/20/2008 10:00:00 PM

    The Rimrock has one of these placards on their hostess' tabnle for "Best Steakhouse." Any objective tongue that's been to the Rimrock knows how hilarious that is, although a "best bar" claim would be pretty legit.

 

Most Popular Stories


Now Click This

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy