Top

arts

Stories

 

Longenbaugh on Theater

Deconstructing the Rep’s and ACT’s season brochures.

From the Rep’s new brochure: staffers en garde.
Andrea J. Walker
From the Rep’s new brochure: staffers en garde.

Here's the usual template for a theater's annual brochure. Cover: a dominating graphic and a snappy seasonal motto. Inside page: an earnest message from the artistic director explaining that this season is the most exciting ever. Next: show descriptions, with big graphics, a short summary of each play, and maybe a fawning review or two. Round it out with the mission statement, some ticket prices, a seating chart, and a profile of the theater's education department, and bam, you're done. It's as predictable and efficient as a mail-order catalog—which it is, basically.

Thankfully, Seattle Rep and ACT are at least trying something different this year. As the regional-theater system confronts a whole collection of headaches, from a lousy economy to an aging audience base, a certain reckless air has crept into their marketing, even regarding such tried-and-true elements as the season brochure.

ACT's new brochure features a cover with two beautiful shots of the building's gleaming-white façade. Open this, and what's revealed are not pictures of plays or staff, but of the audience, well-dressed people standing with drinks in hands and smiles on their faces, chatting in the theater's sumptuous upstairs lobby. "The play's not the only thing," declares the copy in one version. "Don't just go out. Go places you've never been," says the other. (One's for past subscribers, the other is for potential subscribers.) It's not until you open up the brochure fully that you even get to the shows.

The idea is brilliant. ACT's greatest challenge is its size. Their vast downtown home in the converted Fraternal Order of Eagles building includes no less than three stages—four if you count the side room known as Buster's (which has been the home of Late Night Catechism, closing this month after a decade-long run). To survive, ACT needs to do more than sell a few shows—it needs to sell audiences on that building. That's what the new brochure tries to do, similar to the way all those half-empty downtown condos are working it: This isn't just a place, it's a destination and a lifestyle. With its emphasis on "come here and hang out," the brochure also addresses the yearning for social connection that raises theater above most other entertainment choices. It's effective. If I didn't know already, I'd want to find out how I could be standing on that gold-and-scarlet carpet with all those smiling people.

But the Rep's brochure is even better. Its snappy slogan—"Play a part"—admittedly isn't all that snappy. But the cover is striking: It's covered with faces, none of which I immediately recognize. Who are these people? Not actors, despite their costumes and the theatrical lighting. Not until you read artistic director David Esbjornson's message is it explained: "In this brochure you will see everyone from our carpenters to our accountant 'playing a part' in representing the season line-up."

The next few pages show a collection of administrators, stagehands, box-office staff, and others cavorting about on the Rep's bare stage. That woman swinging from the rope in Three Musketeers is the theater's donor-relations manager. The top-hatted Pozzo and the leashed Lucky from Godot? The IT director and the head flyman. It's playful, more than a little weird, and the best argument I've seen in a long time for why institutions like the Rep deserve funding.

Administration types get a lot of grief these days—they're practically the villains in Mike Daisey's How Theater Failed America, which paints them as a parasitic accretion on the wonderful world created by artists. But what this brochure does is remind us just how dependent a large arts institution is on people who do the less-thrilling work that artists don't do, from moving scenery to making phone sales—jobs that require just as much dedication as acting and directing, but are a lot less fun. And it reminds us that we have a part to play as well, as audience members. What the Rep is hoping is that it's a part we're up to taking, preferably as a season subscriber.

 
  • Tim Appelo 08/25/2008 11:25:00 PM

    Interesting

  • Laurence Ballard 08/21/2008 5:44:00 AM

    We're talking about the large institutions here, Mr. Longenbaugh. Not the mid-sized companies, not the Fringe, and most certainly, not talent or dedication to craft. We're talking about the big fish. We're talking about institutions like the Rep with staffs, and market-competitive salaries to match, that have grown at the *expense* of the people who "just do their art." Top Rep actor salary in the early '90's? Between $700-$900 a week. Top salary for an actor at the Rep today? Between $700-$900 a week. Surely you aren't going to make the argument administrative staffs and remuneration haven't increased? As to complaining, bemoaning, and castigating--you bet. Where were you in 1979? No longer on the plantation, I may freely discuss art and money and complacent Trustees in Seattle and how they do business up in the Big House. Why begrudge me finding a salary doing something in addition to my profession? You've done it. You work for a weekly to subsidize your playwrighting and directing. I've joined the faculty of a non-conservatory private college teaching young artists how to become the entrepreneurs they need to be in order to make a living in the theatre in the 21st century. An element of that pedagogy is to train them to become administrators for non-profit institutions.

  • John Longenbaugh 08/21/2008 4:03:00 AM

    Fair enough, Mr. Ballard. But there are plenty of theater artists in Seattle who DO have day-jobs, and a fair number (particularly at mid-sized companies) who do 40-hour a week jobs as administrators, then do their acting and directing at evening and weekend rehearsals. Many of these artists are just as good, and certainly as dedicated to their craft, as full-time actors who get an 8-week contract. There's frankly no way in our current economic climate that we're returning to a repertory system at our larger theaters where artists get year-long contracts to just do their art. Complain, bemoan, castigate--or do what you've done, and find a salary doing something else.

  • Laurence Ballard 08/21/2008 2:38:00 AM

    I begrudge no one (good at what they do) making a living. But while you write about what "artists don't do" consider what it is those same administrators at those large arts institutions don't do: get shown the door after 8 weeks. After three decades in the business, I'd give up a helluva lot of "fun" to make ends meet. One two-month gig at one of these houses--should one be so lucky--is a short-lived "thrill" indeed.

 

Most Popular Stories

for free stuff, theater info & more!

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons


Now Click This

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy