For Florida's sole remaining sex surrogate, love is a many splintered thing.
It's not just giant companies cashing in on America's defense industry.
How a throwaway idea at the Barkley ad agency became the "Sonic Guys."
A diner's guide to Texas's oldest Mexican restaurants.
Employers have been finding ways to game the system since the first employee-protection tax laws were created in the 1930s, says attorney David Marks, who represents workers in wage-loss cases. Most of the avoiders take one of two approaches: pay workers in cash and keep them completely off the books, or declare employees to be "independent contractors." In addition to being tax-exempt for employers, independent contractors don't qualify for overtime or workers' compensation.
Using independent contractors, or freelancers, for specific projects is legal if they're truly independent. The problem, Marks says, is when an employer requires workers to sign on as something other than employees despite the fact that they work for no one else and take all direction, in terms of hours, projects, labor, and payment, from the employer.
Campbell took the game one step further when he graciously brought his workers on as co-owners, forming a company called The Framing Group in 2002. Not only was he spared employment taxes, Campbell was legally able to take money out of his workers' paychecks for equipment and other company supplies. During that time he got a regular gig contracting with local builder Polygon Northwest to do framing work on apartment complexes in the Seattle suburbs. (Framers build the skeleton of a building—interior walls, floors, stairs, etc.)
Campbell would later claim his workers, nearly all of them speaking little or no English, were always business partners, but he had them sign contracts making the partnership official in May 2004. At least a dozen of those workers say in court filings that they were brought in and told to sign a 28-page document filled with English legalese that no one translated. "I was informed that if I did not sign the document, I could no longer continue to work for Shawn Campbell," states Franklin Vides in a translated affidavit. Vides worked for Campbell from April 2002 to March 2005.
Around that time Polygon started raising questions about the status of Campbell's "business partners," many of whom made $10 or $11 an hour while Campbell was paying himself a monthly salary of $10,000. According to court documents filed in a related lawsuit, Polygon didn't trust Campbell's arrangement, so in October 2004, Campbell again called in his workers and had them sign a document reversing the one signed in May. It was enough to make one of the employees feel like he was getting screwed, and in November 2004 he went to the state Department of Labor and Industries.
L&I launched an audit, and in February 2005 sent a bill to Campbell for $1.5 million in unpaid workers'-comp premiums. Three months later, Campbell walked off Polygon's Valley Springs apartment complex in Renton, leaving over $1 million in unpaid bills related to his work on the project, Polygon claims. In May 2005 the company filed suit against Campbell for breach of contract. Campbell's employees joined the suit, seeking overtime and reimbursement for money he took to pay for equipment.
Polygon settled its claim for an undisclosed amount, but Campbell continued to fight the workers, saying they were well aware of the nature of his business and their status as partners. Last July, King County Superior Court Judge Bruce Hilyer sided with the workers, ruling that The Framing Group was a "sham corporate shell to hide various instances of self-dealing and dubious financial and business practices that benefited only [Campbell]."
Hilyer also awarded 12 workers more than $380,000 in overtime and lost wages and another $160,000 in attorney fees and court costs.
The Public Policy Institute's report last fall on the size of the underground construction economy was done at the behest of a new legislative task force created during the 2007 session to reign in abusive contractors. This spring, two bills were signed into law which added additional L&I auditors and more clearly defined the nature of an independent contractor, making it easier to identify instances in which workers have been misclassified.