
Kevin P. Casey
One day last June, Terry Grant left Atwater Prison in California, where he'd been serving time on an array of burglary and gun charges, and boarded a Greyhound bus for Seattle. He had spent most of his last 20 years in prison high on methamphetamine bought on the underground market. But he had found religion recently and resolved to change his life. Ari Kohn wanted to help him.
Kohn is a 60-year-old with shaggy gray hair, prone to wearing worn blue jeans and talking discursively about his favorite subject—ex-cons—with a slight twang that betrays his Southern roots. Kohn and Grant's lawyer, federal defender Michael Filipovic, met the former drug addict at the downtown Greyhound station, took him to eat at Taco Del Mar, and brought him to a federal halfway house where he was due to spend the next six months. A couple of weeks later, Kohn returned to take Grant clothes shopping. Grant needed office attire, because Kohn had persuaded a public defense agency to hire him as a receptionist and messenger. Beyond that, though, Kohn had a bigger plan from which he never wavered, even when Grant himself did. Kohn wanted Grant to go to college, which is where he thinks ex-cons belong.
Prisoner "re-entry" has become a buzzword locally and nationally. As ever-harsher sentencing laws have swelled the prison population, and the national recidivism rate has climbed to over 65 percent, both at great cost to taxpayers, even once hard-on-crime legislators are trying to figure out how to help ease ex-prisoners back into society so that they don't re-offend. Last spring, the Washington State Legislature passed a bill requiring the Department of Corrections to create a "re-entry plan" for every inmate. It mandated that ex-cons receive treatment for addictions, mental health problems, and other underlying causes for their behavior. But the bill did not do much to provide for the more immediate needs of ex-cons emerging from prison—food, clothing, and housing—let alone their higher education.
Kohn has taken it upon himself to fill that vacuum. For three years he's been running, and funding, the Post-Prison Education Program, which takes former prisoners on in entirety—paying for whatever food, housing, and clothing they and their families need. Then Kohn checks up on them, with constant meetings, e-mails, phone calls, and shopping trips.
The program's $200,000-plus annual budget, which currently is covering tuition and living costs for 20 ex-cons in college, comes almost entirely from Kohn and his 87-year-old mother, Florida resident Barbara Hinebaugh. He's a self-described "radical liberal;" she calls herself a "dyed-in-the-wool" Republican. The politically mismatched pair are unusual benefactors. For one thing, he's a felon himself. In 1996, Kohn went to prison on wire-fraud charges related to a benefits company he ran that, according to the government, defrauded a corporate client of thousands of dollars supposed to be used for dependent-care reimbursement. (Kohn says he did not intend to deceive.) He served four-and-a-half years.
For another thing, he and his mom say they are not particularly rich. There is some family money, thanks to an inheritance from Kohn's grandfather, a successful architect, and Kohn made some of his own through periodic work in the finance industry. But now, they say, the money is running out. "We're spending our way into homelessness," Kohn says. "I've used almost all my savings for this project," adds Hinebaugh, who has continued to work full time as a life-insurance agent in order to keep it afloat.
So Kohn is trying to drum up money from outside sources, mainly from the Legislature. His chances are iffy.
A persistent e-mailer and lobbyist, Kohn has quickly gained credibility. Serving on the Post-Prison program's board of directors and advisory committee are lawyers and University of Washington administrators, including the UW's assistant director of admissions, Robin Hennes. Carol Estes, a state lobbyist for the Friends Committee on Washington Public Policy (a Quaker group), who works on criminal justice issues, calls Kohn's "re-entry" program "probably the best in the nation." Where others provide piecemeal help with housing or counseling assistance, she says, Kohn gives ex-cons "whatever they need to succeed."
"I commend him for what he's doing," says Mike Carrell, a Republican state senator from Lakewood. He notes that the state re-entry bill, which he cosponsored, allows the Department of Corrections to use private funds to expand post-secondary education in prisons. (The Legislature pulled the funding on higher-education classes inside prisons in the mid-'90s, a move Carrell says he supported at the time.) "I hope prisoners get a taste of college in prison, which will be a bridge to further education on the outside."
But Carrell says using taxpayer money for a program like Kohn's is "a difficult area for a lot of legislators, and for a lot of people. The argument is made, 'Why should this person who hurt my family be using my money to go to college?'"
Sen. Debbie Regala (D-Tacoma), the other cosponsor of last year's re-entry bill, says she's seen the effectiveness of Kohn's program but cautions that "It's pretty rare that we would put money in the budget for a particular program."
"At the point that I find out I'm not going to get [funding from the Legislature], the program will die," Kohn says. But at the moment, Kohn seems as immersed in it as ever.
In his pleasantly cluttered Wedgwood rental house, propping his bare feet up on his brown sectional, Kohn tells of a call he fielded the other night from one of the program's students, who goes to community college in Spokane. "He was really upset." A guy he lived with had accused the student of stealing his creamer, which he hadn't, according to Kohn. "I spent an hour talking to him. I told him, 'If you go off on this guy, it's going to wreck your life. You've got to discipline yourself.'"





















Reader Comments
Cathryn Chappell reported a meta-analysis in the “Journal of Correctional Education” substantiating, “inmates with at least two years of college have a 10% re-arrest rate compared to a national re-arrest rate of approximately 60%” Educating prisoners has proven to reduce recidivism by more than 50%, increasing public safety and saving billions in taxpayer dollars.
In the article, Senator Carrell is quoted saying that using taxpayer money for a program like Kohn's is "a difficult area for a lot of legislators, and that a lot of people think, 'Why should this person who hurt my family be using my money to go to college?'" That is simply ludicrous! The public is already spending it's money to the tune of $29,500 per year, per prisoner, just to house them in prisons, not to mention the inordinate court costs, defense and prosecuting attorney costs, jail costs, etc. to re-arrest them because upon release there are no tangible opportunities available for uneducated, unskilled ex-prisoners in our society (85% of prisoners read below the 8th grade level).
What is more frugal and fruitful to spend money on? $29,500 per prisoner per year, plus Court costs, etc. or about $8,100 per year per student who does not commit additional crimes and becomes a law-abiding, tax-paying citizen contributing to his or her community—which makes more sense (and why can’t the Washington State Legislature, the Governor, and the public figure this out)???? This program is actually effectively addressing the public safety issue that our elected officials are charged to handle effectively. In fact, it makes incontrovertible sense for the Washington State Legislature to invest in the Post-Prison Education Program, thus enabling the Program to help a greater number of ex-prisoners to become law-abiding, tax-paying citizens. Again, an average of $29,500 per annum to imprison, with two-out-of-three (2:3) returning to prison OR about $8,100 per annum to educate, with only about one-out-of-ten (1:10) recidivating???
It is high time that society and law makers get "Smart" on crime by providing former prisoners real opportunities to change their beliefs, values, thinking and behaviors (which education provides) and give them real opportunities to make a livable wage to support their families.
Albert Einstein put it brilliantly when he said, "We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." And tough on crime thinking has NOT made our communities safer, but on the contrary has greatly increased the recidivism rate, costing us literally billions in the process. No, it is time to stop doing the same things that aren't working and to start doing what is working.
What the Post-Prison Education Program does works! It is making our streets safer and is saving our society huge amounts of money by providing educational opportunities to ex-prisoners, increasing public safety and decreasing public costs—providing for dramatically better lives, not only for the former prisoners, but for their children and families at large.