Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Most Popular

  • A Child Left Behind
    The near-starvation of a teenage girl in Carnation is just the latest case in which the state has failed to protect endangered kids.
  • Bleach: Krist Novoselic Interviews Dale Crover
    The Nirvana bassist chats with the Melvins drummer about making Bleach, Metal Church, and their friend Kurt.
  • Recording Nirvana Before They Were Nirvana
    Jack Endino recorded an unknown, unnamed band at an unmemorable session that he'll never forget.
  • Cover Story: Barack & Load
    Alan Gottlieb’s challenge to a gun ban in the President’s adopted hometown has made it all the way to the Supreme Court, and fattened the ex-con’s wallet in the process.
  • Nirvana: Back in Bleach
    The first Nirvana album was probably the last one you heard, but it marks a critical chapter in Seattle music history.

National Features >

  • City Pages

    Michele Bachmann, Unmuzzled

    You don't need to read Sarah Palin's book to hear the ravings of a mad woman.

    By Matt Snyders

  • Miami New Times

    Pimp Daddy

    The rise and fall of a chubby sex-cult leader.

    By Natalie O'Neill

  • Riverfront Times

    Babe 'n' Arms

    Tom was a hot-tempered cross-dresser with a garage full of guns--and then he became Rachel.

    By Nicholas Phillips

  • Dallas Observer

    The Fight for Texas

    Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison are locked in a battle over the soul of the GOP. They're also running for governor.

    By Sam Merten

When Pedophiles Think They're Lovers

By Judy McGuire

Published on August 28, 2007 at 9:22pm

I get a lot of weird stuff in the mail—most of it more funny than frightening. But about three years ago, I received a letter from a pedophile. This guy had written me many times before, mostly droning on about his hooker habit (he even had a Web site devoted to his hobby). His letters were super-creepy, and the intense, psychotic loathing he professed for the sex workers he regularly hired was so palpable, I wondered if he was a serial killer. But this particular letter was different. This time he told me he'd given up on banging pros and, instead, found himself increasingly drawn to little girls. Gulp.

He wrote, "I don't watch much adult TV anymore because I'm checking out the girls on Nick, Disney, etc. I don't consider myself a pedophile and believe that forcing my man-size penis into a girl-size vagina is an abusive and violent act. However, I see nothing wrong with loving, nurturing touch, like cuddling, kissing, massages, and stroking hair."

I remember being uncertain if I should print the letter; in fact, he followed his original note with another letter castigating me for ignoring him. I wasn't sure if he was for real, but after a lot of thought and discussion, my editors and I decided to go with it, and the column ran in the Jan. 26, 2005, issue.

The week it ran, a detective from the Seattle Police Department contacted me and asked if I knew the guy's real name or any other identifying details. After consulting with the Weekly's lawyer, I told him everything I knew, which wasn't much. I mean, I didn't know his name because he signed all his letters "Uncircumcised." (Yeah, I didn't need to know that, either.) The detective told me that they were trying to find him because they were afraid he'd already started abusing girls.

As far as they know, he hasn't. Instead, he dismantled his hooker Web site and turned it into a girl-watching blog—since shut down—complete with photo documentation mapping out his favorite child-watching spots.

In his letter to me, it seemed like he wanted help. He wrote, "The problem is that I'm afraid it might eventually progress beyond that—into Jacko-style sleepovers, showers, full-nude body contact, cunnilingus, etc. I'm aware of how harsh the laws are regarding adults fooling around with girls this young, but the power of the attraction is difficult for me to resist." Ugh.

I gave him several options for getting help and kind of forgot about it until I saw a story in The New York Times about a self-professed pedophile who'd been strong-armed out of Seattle and onto the streets of L.A. I knew instantly it was the same guy. Turns out, his name is Jack McClellan, and as I write this, he's just been released from lockup after being arrested twice in the same day for violating a restraining order that demanded he keep at least 10 yards away from children.

Once I learned his name, I did some research and found that he'd apparently made another appearance in our paper. In a letter to the editor, he argued, "Anyone who is old enough to reproduce is old enough to accept some responsibility for whom they have sex with."

McClellan has also appeared on pretty much any TV show that'll have him, has spoken to the print media extensively, and now proudly calls himself a pedophile. A label he resisted when he wrote me way back when.

No doubt McClellan is one sick bastard, but I wonder if this is just a twisted bid for attention and/or help. Note that he hasn't been accused of molesting any children, just of staring, photographing, and blogging about them. His photo has been so widely published that pretty much any parent with a television set has it memorized by now.

Legal experts say the restraining order was unrealistic, unenforceable, and unconstitutional, all of which, it seems, is true. Meanwhile, what to do? Whether or not he's a threat to children (and it sure seems like he's headed in that direction), he's obviously mentally unbalanced. Scary.

Dating dilemmas? Write Dategirl at dategirl@seattleweekly.com or c/o Seattle Weekly, 1008 Western Ave., Ste. 300, Seattle, WA 98104.