Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Most Popular

  • Take an Ax to It
    The state's program for handling injured workers is in a world of hurt.
  • Thread Man Walking
    Niilartey De Osu is trying to start a couture craze in Seattle, but some former business partners wish he'd just pull off the runway.
  • His Sweet Lorraine
    Seven years after his ex-wife shot and killed another woman, Rich Laxton keeps draining his savings to exonerate her.
  • Cover Story: Washington’s Candy Land of Tax Breaks
    As our cash-strapped state prepares to cut services for the poor and mentally ill, billions of dollars in tax breaks and exemptions are still being doled out.
  • BIAW Tries the Direct Approach
    Advocates of workers'-comp reform are angling for an initiative on the ballot.

National Features >

  • Houston Press

    Hate to Say We Told You So

    A year before Toyota's massive recall, we published a lengthy investigation of problems with the Prius.

    By Paul Knight

  • Miami New Times

    Sex, Drugs, Gambling--and Football

    Heading to Miami for the Super Bowl? Don't leave the hotel without our guide to vice in the Magic City.

    By Michael J. Mooney and Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • City Pages

    Life in the Blue Zone

    Daredevil Dan Buettner's latest trick? Bringing the secrets of immortality to Minnesota.

    By Erin Carlyle

  • Phoenix New Times

    The Greatest Dane

    Bigger than Shaq and proud of it, the world's tallest dog may be living in Tucson.

    By James King

They're Not Sharing

A homeless-shelter provider refuses city money, citing privacy concerns about data collection—and vowing to open more tent cities.

Philip Dawdy

Published on October 19, 2005

One of the city's longtime homeless-shelter providers is likely to have city funding cut, possibly leaving about 300 homeless people without a place to sleep, because of a dispute over data required by the city under King County's nascent 10-year plan to end homelessness. The provider, SHARE/WHEEL, which organizes the roving Tent City program, is threatening to retaliate by opening three more homeless encampments in Seattle if it loses $227,000 in city funding next March. Besides running tent cities of up to 100 residents each in Seattle and on the Eastside, the group houses about 300 people a night at 14 small shelters throughout the city, many located at churches.

The dispute arose because the city and King County will require homeless service providers to enter client data into a computerized system called Safe Harbors. SHARE/WHEEL stands for Seattle Housing and Resource Efforts and Women's Housing, Equality, and Enhancement League. Organizers decline to speak for attribution, but they oppose personal-data collection on principle. In their mind, asking homeless people to provide name, age, and race, for example, is discriminatory, multiplying the stigma of homelessness.

But Patricia McInturff, the city's Human Services Department director, says that every other provider in the city is going to comply with the data requirement, and that collecting such data is a crucial piece in combating homelessness. "We can't end homelessness unless we understand who is homeless and what works" to end homelessness, she says. Under the 10-year plan, the service emphasis is to shift from getting King County's estimated 8,000 homeless off the streets one night at a time to getting them off the streets for a lifetime, by offering long-term housing and connecting them with an array of social services. Personal identifiers, McInturff says, will be stripped from the data once it hits the city's computers. "If we could do it for AIDS patients, we can do it here," she says.

Which providers get what slice of the city's $5 million for shelter beds in 2006 will not be announced until late November. SHARE/WHEEL won't be among them, says McInturff, because they won't comply with the data requirement. She and Alan Painter, the agency's acting deputy director, say they tried to work with SHARE/WHEEL to find a way to accommodate them, but the group was steadfast. They add that any lost shelter beds from SHARE/WHEEL will be made up by other providers.

It's not likely that the group, one of the oldest continuously operating peer-run homeless organizations in the country, will find willing ears on the City Council, if it takes the issue there. "I don't understand their thinking," says City Council member Tom Rasmussen, chair of the council's Human Services Committee. "How is this the best service for the people they are working for? Who is benefiting from that?"

pdawdy@seattleweekly.com