Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

Most Popular

National Features >

  • Village Voice

    The Great Walls of Chinatown

    With the exception of the electric rice cookers, this Bowery tenement could have come straight from the Nineteenth Century.

    By Elizabeth Dwoskin

  • Houston Press

    Getting Off

    DUI attorney Tyler Flood wins 80 percent of his trials--even if his clients were 100 percent drunk.

    By Mike Giglio

  • Miami New Times

    Park or Die Tryin'

    From the homeless parking mafia to the meter fairy, finding a spot in Miami has taken a turn toward the surreal.

    By Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • City Pages

    The Baddest Men on the Planet

    Straight from the Sam's Club tire shop, Brett Rogers prepares to meet Fedor Emelianenko in mortal combat.

    By Bradley Campbell

Loophole Insurance

A federal bill threatens our mental-health parity law.

Gwen Davis

Published on August 31, 2005

A bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and pending in the Senate would exempt some insurers from complying with a state law enacted this year that will require coverage for mental-health care. The Small Business Health Fairness Act, HR 525, would enable creation of "association health plans" (AHPs) that would not be subject to state health insurance regulations.

"This would clearly undermine Washington state's recent success at passing legislation for a mental-health insurance parity law," says Randy Revelle, a lobbyist for the Washington State Hospital Association. The mental-health insurance parity bill, passed by the Legislature after years of effort by backers like Revelle, requires that insurance coverage for mental-health services be comparable to that for medical and surgical services. The legislation provided for a phase-in of the law by 2010, starting next year. While many insurance plans cover some psychiatric treatment, the coverage usually is limited.

AHPs would be less-costly, federally regulated plans that organizations could offer to small businesses to provide benefits for employees. AHPs would be much cheaper than normal insurance plans, and employers would have less bureaucracy to deal with. Large companies, such as Microsoft and Boeing, would continue to offer health-insurance plans subject to the parity law.

The Senate version of HR 525 has been referred to the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, of which U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., is a member.

gdavis@seattleweekly.com