Movies

Choresh Wald

Troubled teen Gvirtz in Wings.

Related Content

• Valley Girl
  August 20, 2003
• Close-up
  February 13, 2002
• Forget serious
  May 24, 2000
• Their gang
  March 10, 1999
• Lethal Weapon
  December 2, 2009

More About

• Mel Gibson
• Julia Stiles
• Jafar Panahi
• Religion
• Christianity

Share

Broken Wings
Runs Fri., April 2–Thurs., April 8, at Varsity

Like the working-class Israeli clan it so sensitively depicts, Wings starts out in familiar territory, then makes its way to a place that feels fresh and hopeful. It's about a family struggling to stay together in the face of everyday stresses; the film's insights and rewards, on the other hand, are anything but commonplace. First-time director Nir Bergman also wrote the no-nonsense screenplay, which gives equal attention to widowed matriarch Dafna (the excellent Orli Zilbershatz-Banai), her rebellious 17-year-old daughter Maya (Maya Maron), Maya's troubled brother Yair (Nitai Gvirtz), and the teenagers' two young siblings. This is not the sort of domestic drama that relegates youngsters to lesser roles; as in The Ice Storm, the kids face real dilemmas that figure prominently in the story, since the adults essentially leave them to fend for themselves.

Wings additionally skirts cliché by infusing situations we've seen before—the single mom fighting to make ends meet, the plucky aspiring pop star (Maya)—with the desires and foibles of very specific people. We know Dafna's tough exterior has to yield at some point, but when the cracks begin to show (during the videotaping of a personal ad), the reason is refreshingly mundane: She's lonely, and her loneliness embarrasses her. The winner of nine Israeli Academy Awards, Wings is composed of such small moments, as when Yair and his sometime girlfriend, Iris (Dana Ivgy), negotiate their relationship while sitting nude in an open window. Bergman's auspicious debut compellingly explores Israeli life from an emotional—rather than political— perspective, looking beyond the violence to examine quieter conflicts that are no less crucial. (R) NEAL SCHINDLER

Crimson Gold
Opens Fri., April 2, at Varsity

Gold begins with a heist gone all wrong. In a great, single-take, agonizingly slow dolly shot, the camera mercilessly frames a weary robber as he kills a jeweler, then sinks out of the frame, revolver poised in his own mouth, as sirens and witnesses wail in the doorway behind. From there, the movie loops back to tell the story that leads to this botched crime.

Alas, despite the Tarantino-esque structure, this is no Pulp Fiction; written by Abbas Kiarostami and directed by Jafar Panahi (the team behind The White Balloon), Gold is more like a restaged Of Mice and Men played by mental-ward patients on Haldol. In fact, the fleshy, hulking Lennie figure, Hussein, is on cortisone for some unspecified ailment, which turns him from a pizza-delivery schlump into a near-expressionless lump. His smaller, chattier cohort, Ali (Kamyar Sheisi), is lively but irritating. (In a remake, John C. Reilly would play the big guy, and Steve Buscemi the small fry.)

Poor proles Hussein and Ali dream of riches; they dream of respect; but mainly they tool around Tehran's teeming traffic on a motorbike, which is about as exciting as things get in this film after the opening scene. When a carriage-trade jeweler offends their touchy sense of dignity, you know where things are headed.

As Hussein, Hossain Emadeddin is suitably stolid, an unwitting ox being lead to slaughter by Iran's corrupt theocracy. In a long, tedious scene, Hussein is detained by the police while they raid an upper-class party of boozing, dancing teen­agers; this, Kiarostami and Panahi imply, is where Iran's hard-earned tax rials are going to waste. Maybe the dosage is wrong on Hussein's meds. Maybe the army owes him a pension for past service and possible war injuries. Maybe the injustice of the system conspires to keep the poor in their place. Or maybe all of those things are true. But unlike The Circle, Panahi's excellent 2000 depiction of Iranian women victimized by the same cruel regime, this movie isn't just depressing, it's depressed. (NR) BRIAN MILLER

The Gospel of John
Opens Fri., April 2, at Meridian

I have good news and bad news about the new Jesus movie directed by Philip Saville (who irreverently calls his and Mel Gibson's films "cruciflicks"). Unlike The Passion of the Christ, this picture is much more sensitive to charges of anti-Semitism. The problem is that John's Gospel, written two generations after Jesus, when the infant church was in mortal combat with traditional Jewish authorities, depicts the latter as bad guys. The other three "synoptic" Gospels go easier on the Jews. So The Gospel's producers decided to base their movie on the Good News Bible, which tries to defuse the anti-Semitism bomb by translating "the Jews" as "the Jewish authorities." More clearly than in the first cut of Gibson's movie, this one—produced by a Jewish Broadway impresario, Garth Drabinsky—depicts the conflict as a matter of sects and violence, not a blanket condemnation of all Jews for all time.

This is commendable. But for me, the bad news outweighs it. The Good News Bible is bad news as translation: It steamrolls all drama and poetry into a literal-minded yet not very faithful paraphrase in modern bland-speak. A King James Version line like "Their throat is an open sepulcher" becomes "They flatter with their tongue." (The Good News version of Macbeth would read, "Tomorrow, and the day after that, and the day after that.") The most painful thing about this movie is not the very mild, PG-13 crucifixion, but having to sit through three infernal hours of Good News monologues. Instead of "Verily, I say unto thee," Jesus yawps, "I am telling you the truth!" maybe 17 times.