Most Popular
Recent Blog Posts
National Features >
Media, State PoliticsPublished on June 25, 2003MEDIA Are they practicing censorship over at the Washington News Council? That's what Helen Swenson, KIRO-TV news director, alleged last week. On June 14, the council found KIRO at fault in a complaint brought before it by the state's beef and dairy industries. They disputed stories last fall in which reporter Chris Halsne made accusations about the industry's introduction of so-called "downer" cattle into the food supply. The council found Halsne's work inaccurate and unfair and KIRO hit the ceiling, insisting that its reports were accurate and that the council was engaging in what Swenson termed "censorship." The findings of the nonprofit, unofficial council cannot compel KIRO to do anything. Still, the charge of censorship stung the council. Its chairman, former State Supreme Court Justice Robert Utter, and other council officials issued a statement, saying, "We have never seen a persuasive argument that a news council in any way threatens the right to a free press" and calling Swenson's censorship charge "unfounded." PHILIP DAWDY Just because Hearst Corp. is paranoid about how its Seattle Post-Intelligencer is promoted or notby joint-operating-agreement overlord The Seattle Times doesn't mean the Times isn't out to get the P-I. Observed Tuesday, June 24, at First Avenue and Madison Street: a Times rack and a P-I rack, side by side as usual, but both displaying and containing that day's Times. (Note to Justice Department, which is investigating the papers in light of the Times' desire to cease publication and distribution of the P-I: Photo evidence available on request.) Of course, it's possible that some P-I person set this up, 100 feet from Seattle Weekly world headquarters, so we'd see it and write about it, thereby besmirching the Times. But that would be paranoid of us. CHUCK TAYLOR STATE POLITICS
write your comment
|