Medium and massacre

PHOTOS BY ROBIN LAANANEN

Related Content

• Kyle Abraham
  April 11, 2012
• Paul Allen's ID Allegedly Stolen by Inept Army Deserter Who Paid Loan, Went to Dollar Store
  March 27, 2012
• Night of the Living Dead
  October 12, 2011
• Bill Leavy, NFL Referee Who Botched Seahawks/Steelers Super Bowl, Returns to Ref Rematch on Sunday
  September 14, 2011
• ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ZOMG One Direction Is Coming to the KeyArena on July 28 . . . of 2013
  April 12, 2012

More About

• Tony Blair
• Pittsburgh
• The Pentagon
• Politics
• Military and Defense Policy

Like this Story?

Sign up for the Weekly Newsletter: Our weekly feature stories, movie reviews, calendar picks and more - minus the newsprint and sent directly to your inbox.

Privacy Policy Cancel Continue

THERE WAS AN EERIE parallel between medium and massacre. The mightiest military machine in history can do nearly nothing to protect the last remaining superpower against stealthy attacks like Tuesday's, and Bush's hallowed missile defense will do even less; in this sort of war, the factor that counts is the human one. Likewise in the reporting of it. The kamikaze hijackings that destroyed the World Trade Center towers and smashed one wing of the Pentagon left the national media in shock—dazed, confused, and behind the curve, for all their news gathering resources.

At home, we watched and listened to the national network reports while fielding anxious calls from overseas checking to see if Seattle was burning too. The differences in what information (and supposition) got through here and there was instructive. While the U.S. networks ran and reran footage of the Trade Center towers crumbling and Brokaw, Rather, and Jennings looked for words, TV Globo and other Brazilian channels also showed the rest of the world's response—from Tony Blair announcing Britain's security measures to crowds in some Middle Eastern countries cheering. Even before the American networks announced a "traffic jam" at Pittsburgh's airport, their Brazilian counterparts reported that a hijacked plane had crashed in Pennsylvania.

Of course, they also reported that as many as eight planes had been hijacked and other American locations attacked, prompting the panicked calls we got; there's something to be said for restraint and waiting for confirmation. Not that U.S. media were immune to overkill. As of 3:45 EST, CNN.com was reporting: "Pentagon collapses after plane crashes into it." The armed forces may like that spin; they can demand a new headquarters along with a new budget to fight this new war.

escigliano@seattleweekly.com